Advanced search
Start date

Fight against COVID-19: Brazil in comparative perspective


The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, which has resulted in high mortality and morbidity rates, represents a challenge to health systems and services across the globe. How have governments responded to this pandemic? What is the gap in timing between the emergence of cases in a given country and that government's decision to enact control measures? Perhaps more importantly: how and why are these strategies adopted? Finally, what can be done to prevent a similar disaster in the future? In collaboration with the University of Michigan School of Public Health, our team will investigate the variables that explain different countries' responses to COVID-19. A research grant from the São Paulo Research Foundation will allow our team to conduct field research in Brazil according to three goals: (i) explore the health system's responses throughout the development of the pandemic; (ii) investigate how social protection initiatives have been adopted in order to foster public health initiatives, such as quarantine; and (iii) analyze, using comparative perspective, how and why these decisions have been made and provide recommendations to policy-makers, in addition to establishing lessons learned from this pandemic. This study will combine qualitative, policy analysis research and epidemiological data to explore the extent to which the following dimensions do or do not contribute to an understanding of Brazil's decisions during the pandemic: the country's historical background in responding to public health emergencies; state capacity for crisis management, especially in public health; and coordination and initiatives by political parties. Our study will be one of the first initiatives to investigate the variables that explain, in comparative perspective, the different strategies used to counter the coronavirus pandemic. In addition, our publications will inform future COVID-19 studies and help to shape the debates about what this pandemic may mean for the disciplines of comparative public policy and health policy management. (AU)

Articles published in Agência FAPESP Newsletter about the research grant:
Articles published in other media outlets (0 total):
More itemsLess items

Scientific publications (5)
(References retrieved automatically from Web of Science and SciELO through information on FAPESP grants and their corresponding numbers as mentioned in the publications by the authors)
FONSECA, ELIZE M. DA; JARMAN, HOLLY; KING, ELIZABETH J.; GREER, SCOTT L.. Perspectives in the study of the political economy of COVID-19 vaccine regulation. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, . (15/18604-5, 20/05230-8)
GREER, SCOTT L.; FONSECA, ELIZE MASSARD; RAJ, MINAKSHI; WILLISON, CHARLEY E.. Institutions and the politics of agency in COVID-19 response: Federalism, executive power, and public health policy in Brazil, India, and the US. JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, v. N/A, p. 19-pg., . (20/05230-8)
GREER, SCOTT L.; JARMAN, HOLLY; FALKENBACH, MICHELLE; MASSARD DA FONSECA, ELIZE; RAJ, MINAKSHI; KING, ELIZABETH J.. Social policy as an integral component of pandemic response: Learning from COVID-19 in Brazil, Germany, India and the United States. GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH, v. 16, n. 8-9, SI, p. 1209-1222, . (20/05230-8)
DA FONSECA, ELIZE MASSARD; SHADLEN, KENNETH C.; BASTOS, FRANCISCO I.. The politics of COVID-19 vaccination in middle-income countries: Lessons from Brazil. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, v. 281, . (20/05230-8)
DA FONSECA, ELIZE M.; JARMAN, HOLLY; KING, ELIZABETH J.; GREER, SCOTT L.. Perspectives in the study of the political economy of COVID-19 vaccine regulation. REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, v. 16, n. 4, p. 7-pg., . (20/05230-8, 15/18604-5)

Please report errors in scientific publications list using this form.