Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy

Full text
Author(s):
Barros, Sergio Estelita [1] ; Janson, Guilherme [1] ; Chiqueto, Kelly [1] ; Garib, Daniela Gamba [1] ; Janson, Marcos
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, BR-17012901 Sao Paulo - Brazil
Total Affiliations: 1
Document type: Journal article
Source: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS; v. 140, n. 4, p. E181-E192, OCT 2011.
Web of Science Citations: 22
Abstract

Introduction: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mini-implant diameter on fracture risk and self-drilling efficacy. Methods: A sample of 405 mini-implants with 9 diameters from 1.2 to 2.0 mm was used. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were placed in artificial bone, and 25 were placed in pig iliac bone to evaluate placement torque (PT) and axial placement load (APL), which represents self-drilling efficacy. Ten mini-implants of each diameter were used to determine fracture torque (FT). The different diameters were compared regarding PT, FT, and APL. The fracture risk of each diameter was evaluated by the fracture resistance index (FT/PT x {[}FT-PT]). The PT and APL changes during placement were correlated. Results: Only PT and FT were different for all mini-implant diameter changes. PT and FT showed a strong correlation with the mini-implant diameter, but the APL was weakly to moderately correlated. The fracture resistance index was remarkably greater for each 0.1 mm added in diameter. The PT increased significantly, whereas the APL was progressively reduced during placement. Conclusions: Increases in mini-implant diameters significantly influenced the increases of PT and FT on quantities that progressively reduced the fracture risk. The self-drilling efficacy was not strongly influenced by diameter. (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011;140:e181-e192) (AU)

FAPESP's process: 08/06609-9 - THE INFLUENCE OF MINI-IMPLANT DIAMETER ON FRACTURE PREVENTION
Grantee:Sérgio Estelita Cavalcante Barros
Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral