Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree

Caminhada para a avaliação do equilíbrio em indivíduos saudáveis com idade igual ou superior a 40 anos

Processo: 09/17646-5
Linha de fomento:Auxílio à Pesquisa - Publicações científicas - Artigo
Vigência: 01 de fevereiro de 2010 - 31 de julho de 2010
Área do conhecimento:Ciências da Saúde - Fisioterapia e Terapia Ocupacional
Pesquisador responsável:Victor Zuniga Dourado
Beneficiário:Victor Zuniga Dourado
Instituição-sede: Instituto de Saúde e Sociedade (ISS). Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP). Campus Baixada Santista. Santos , SP, Brasil
Assunto(s):Caminhada  Marcha (locomoção)  Equilíbrio postural  Publicações de divulgação científica  Artigo científico 

Resumo

Background: The Berg scale and the timed 'up and go' test (TUG) are established measures to assess mobility in frail older adults. As an alternative to self-paced tests to assess aerobic exercise capacity, the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) was developed. We hypothesized that ISWT may be useful for the assessment of aerobic capacity and balance simultaneously in healthy adults. Objectives: There are 3 objectives: (1) to evaluate the intra-tester reliability of TUG in healthy subjects; (2) to compare the validity of TUG, ISWT and comfortable gait speed (GS) to evaluate balance assessed by the Berg balance scale; and (3) to evaluate the correlations among these walking tests. Methods: We studied a sample of 64 subjects (82.81% women) aged 40--84 years to assess the intra-tester reliability of TUG. Of these, 21 subjects also performed ISWT, GS and the Berg balance scale. We also assessed height, weight, body mass index, spirometry and reported physical activity. Results: The average time to complete TUG was 7.23 ± 1.27 s. The interclass correlation coefficient of TUG was excellent (0.936; 95% CI: 0.895--0.961). Age (r = 0.36), GS (r = --0.64), GS/height (r = --0.44), ISWT (r = -0.65) and the Berg score (r = -0.65) were correlated with TUG (p < 0.05). The Berg score was significantly (p < 0.05) correlated with GS (r = 0.61) and ISWT (r = 0.61). Moreover, ISWT was mutually related with GS (r = 0.68). We evaluated 2 models of linear regression, using GS and TUG as independent variables in each of them. In the 1st model, GS described 47% of the ISWT variability. In the 2nd, TUG described 42.7% of the ISWT variability. Conclusions: The capacity of walking is related to balance in healthy adults and seniors. Our results suggest the usefulness of ISWT as a new tool for the simultaneous evaluation of the aerobic capacity and balance in healthy subjects. An important part of the ISWT variation was explained by GS and TUG. Secondly, we confirmed the significant influence of age in the TUG performance and the excellent reliability of this field walking test. (AU)