Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Neither self-reported ethnicity nor declared family origin are reliable indicators of genomic ancestry

Texto completo
Autor(es):
de Andrade Ramos, Bruna Ribeiro [1] ; Barbieri D'Elia, Maria Paula [2] ; Trindade Amador, Marcos Antonio [3] ; Carneiro Santos, Ney Pereira [3] ; Batista Santos, Sidney Emanuel [3] ; Castelli, Erick da Cruz [1] ; Witkin, Steven S. [4] ; Miot, Helio Amante [2] ; Bartoli Miot, Luciane Donida [2] ; da Silva, Marcia Guimaraes [1]
Número total de Autores: 10
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Pathol, UNESP, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Dermatol & Radiotherapy, UNESP, BR-18618970 Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Fed Univ Para, Inst Biol Sci, Dept Genet, UFPA, BR-66059 Belem, Para - Brazil
[4] Weill Cornell Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New York, NY - USA
Número total de Afiliações: 4
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Genetica; v. 144, n. 3, p. 259-265, JUN 2016.
Citações Web of Science: 21
Resumo

Ancestry information can be useful in investigations of diseases with a genetic or infectious background. As the Brazilian population is highly admixed physical traits tend to be poor indicators of ancestry. The assessment of ancestry by ancestry informative markers (AIMs) can exclude the subjectivity of self-declared ethnicity and reported family origin. We aimed to evaluate the reliability of self-reported ethnicity or reported family origin as indicators of genomic ancestry in a female population from the Southeast of Brazil. Two cohorts were included: 404 women asked to self-report their ethnicity (Pop1) and 234 women asked to report their family's origin (Pop2). Identification of AIMs was performed using a panel of 61 markers and results were plotted against parental populations-Amerindian, Western European and Sub-Saharan African-using Structure v2.3.4. In Pop1 57.4 % of women self-reported as white, 34.6 % as brown and 8.0 % as black. Median global European, Amerindian and African contributions were 66.8, 12.6 and 16.6 %. In Pop2, 66.4 % of women declared European origin, 23.9 % African origin and 26.9 % Amerindian. Median global European, Amerindian and African contributions were 80.8, 7.3 and 7.6 %, respectively. Only 31.0 and 21.0 % of the global variation in African and European contributions, respectively, could be explained by self-reported ethnicity and reported family origin only accounted for 20.0 and 5.0 % of the variations observed in African and European ancestries, respectively. Amerindian ancestry did not influence self-reported ethnicity or declared family origin. Neither self-reported ethnicity nor declared family origin are reliable indicators of genomic ancestry in these Brazilian populations. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 11/08083-7 - Polimorfismos de genes pró e anti-inflamatórios candidatos à predisposição à rotura prematura de membranas pré-termo e ao trabalho de parto pré-termo
Beneficiário:Bruna Ribeiro de Andrade Ramos
Linha de fomento: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 11/09433-1 - Polimorfismos de genes pró e anti-inflamatórios candidatos à predisposição à rotura prematura de membranas pré-termo e ao trabalho de parto pré-termo
Beneficiário:Márcia Guimarães da Silva
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular