Busca avançada
Ano de início
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Phylogeographic model selection leads to insight into the evolutionary history of four-eyed frogs

Texto completo
Thome, Maria Tereza C. ; Carstens, Bryan C.
Número total de Autores: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America; v. 113, n. 29, p. 8010-8017, JUL 19 2016.
Citações Web of Science: 18

Phylogeographic research investigates biodiversity at the interface between populations and species, in a temporal and geographic context. Phylogeography has benefited from analytical approaches that allow empiricists to estimate parameters of interest from the genetic data (e.g., theta = 4Ne mu, population divergence, gene flow), and the widespread availability of genomic data allow such parameters to be estimated with greater precision. However, the actual inferences made by phylogeographers remain dependent on qualitative interpretations derived from these parameters' values and as such may be subject to overinterpretation and confirmation bias. Here we argue in favor of using an objective approach to phylogeographic inference that proceeds by calculating the probability of multiple demographic models given the data and the subsequent ranking of these models using information theory. We illustrate this approach by investigating the diversification of two sister species of four-eyed frogs of northeastern Brazil using single nucleotide polymorphisms obtained via restriction-associated digest sequencing. We estimate the composite likelihood of the observed data given nine demographic models and then rank these models using Akaike information criterion. We demonstrate that estimating parameters under a model that is a poor fit to the data is likely to produce values that lead to spurious phylogeographic inferences. Our results strongly imply that identifying which parameters to estimate from a given system is a key step in the process of phylogeographic inference and is at least as important as being able to generate precise estimates of these parameters. They also illustrate that the incorporation of model uncertainty should be a component of phylogeographic hypothesis tests. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 13/09088-8 - A história da Caatinga: explorando padrões filogeográficos e processos evolutivos em cada três anfíbios com dados de sequenciamento de nova geração
Beneficiário:Maria Tereza Chiarioni Thomé
Linha de fomento: Bolsas no Exterior - Estágio de Pesquisa - Pós-Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 11/51392-0 - A história da Caatinga: filogeografia comparada de anfíbios enfrentando um bioma xérico
Beneficiário:Maria Tereza Chiarioni Thomé
Linha de fomento: Bolsas no Brasil - Pós-Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 12/50255-2 - Filogeografia de anfibios comuns em regioes pouco estudadas do brasil:a caatinga e a regiao subtropical.
Beneficiário:João Miguel de Barros Alexandrino
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular