Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Anaerobic metabolism during short all-out efforts in tethered running: Comparison of energy expenditure and mechanical parameters between different sprint durations for testing

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Barros Sousa, Filipe Antonio [1, 2] ; Vasque, Rubens Eduardo [1] ; Gobatto, Claudio Alexandre [1]
Número total de Autores: 3
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Appl Sci, Limeira, SP - Brazil
[2] Einstein Integrated Fac Limeira, Limeira - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: PLoS One; v. 12, n. 6 JUN 9 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 1
Resumo

This study's aims to verify the energy expenditure, metabolic distress and usefulness to evaluate the anaerobic constructs for different all-out durations in running efforts. Twelve active male underwent four testing sessions, one for familiarization and three performing one all-out (AO) tethered running sprint lasting 30s, 20s or 10s. Oxygen consumption, excess post exercise oxygen consumption, and lactate production were retained to analyse metabolic function, together with mechanical power and work as performance parameters. Paired results were compared via one-way ANOVA for repeated measures (Tukey-HSD post-hoc), effect sizes and ICC for absolute agreement. Statistical significance was accepted at p <= 0.05. Despite total and energy expenditure from oxidative pathway being significantly higher for longer durations (p < 0.001; ES > 0.7), glycolytic energy expenditure presented an agreement between AO30s and AO20s (ICC-A = 0.63{*}), while the paired comparisons to AO10s have presented significant differences (p < 0.01; ES > 1.0). Phosphagen energy expenditure were similar between all-out durations (p = 0.12; ICC-A = 0.62{*}; ES < 0.5). Maximum mechanical power was higher in AO10s than in AO30s (p = 0.03; ES = 0.6), not being different between AO10s and AO20s (p = 0.67; ICC-A = 0.88{*}; ES = 0.2) and between AO20s and AO30s (p = 0.18; ICC-A = 0.56{*}; ES = 0.4). In addition, agreement between work in the first ten seconds was confirmed via ICC only between AO10s and AO20s (p = 0.50; ICC-A = 0.86{*}; ES = 0.3), but not for the other paired comparisons (p < 0.1; ICC < 0.45; ES > 0.5). AO20s is a better alternative to estimate anaerobic power and capacity in one single test, with similar oxidative demand than AO30s. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 13/16710-7 - Validade e reprodutibilidade de parâmetros de capacidade e potência aeróbias e anaeróbias obtidas por meio de uma sessão de avaliação em corrida atada
Beneficiário:Filipe Antônio de Barros Sousa
Linha de fomento: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 09/08535-5 - Padronização e validação de testes aeróbios e anaeróbios em condições de campo e laboratório, utilizando modelos livre, atado e semi-atado, em corredores fundistas e velocistas
Beneficiário:Claudio Alexandre Gobatto
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular