Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Evaluating influence of the genotypes in the follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Ser680Asn (rs6166) polymorphism on poor and hyper-responders to ovarian stimulation: a meta-analysis

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Pabalan, Noel [1, 2, 3] ; Trevisan, Camila Martins [4] ; Peluso, Carla [4] ; Jarjanazi, Hamdi [5] ; Christofolini, Denise Maria [4] ; Barbosa, Caio Parente [4] ; Bianco, Bianca [4]
Número total de Autores: 7
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Angeles Univ Fdn, Ctr Res & Dev, Angeles City 2009 - Philippines
[2] Cebu Doctors Univ, Grad Sch, Mandaue City 6014 - Philippines
[3] St Louis Univ, Res & Extens Off, Baguiocity 2006 - Philippines
[4] Fac Med ABC, Human Reprod & Genet Ctr, Dept Collect Hlth, Santo Andr, SP - Brazil
[5] Ontario Minist Environm, Environm Monitoring & Reporting Branch, Etobicoke, ON M9P 3V6 - Canada
Número total de Afiliações: 5
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF OVARIAN RESEARCH; v. 7, n. 122 DEC 20 2014.
Citações Web of Science: 7
Resumo

Background/aims: Reported associations of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation response (COH) with genotypes of the Ser680Asn (N680S) polymorphism in the follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) gene have conflicting results. Methods: PubMed and Embase databases were searched for studies that investigated the N680S polymorphism in the FSHR gene in COH. Parameters used to examine ovarian response were poor and hyper-responses to COH. Using the meta-analytic approach, we estimated ovarian response risk (odds ratio {[}OR] with 95% confidence intervals) according to genotype. Results: Our findings showed that SS genotype carriers were most likely to be poor responders (OR 1.61, p = 0.08) compared to the NN and NS genotypes which showed no associations (OR 0.93-0.95, p = 0.75-0.78). Heterogeneity of these pooled ORs warranted examining its sources. We detected outlying studies in each of the three N680S genotypes. Omitting these outliers erased the heterogeneity of the recalculated pooled outcomes. It also materially altered the SS effects where carriers became slightly unlikely to be poor responders (OR 0.90, p = 0.52). The S allele carrier effect was modulated for poor responders (OR 1.24, p = 0.39) in the Non-Hispanic Caucasian (NHC) subgroup. The likelihood of the S allele carriers (OR 1.47, p = 0.02) and the unlikelihood of the N allele carriers (OR 0.64, p = 0.007) were significant in our hyper-response findings. Confined to NHC retained significance of the S allele effects (OR 1.57, p = 0.01) but not among the N allele carriers (OR 0.68, p = 0.18). Conclusions: In summary, this is a meta-analytical confirmation of the FSHR SS genotype role in COH response. Hyper-responder analysis strengths lie on the non-heterogeneity and robustness of its results. Non-robustness and heterogeneity of the poor-responder results compose its limitations. Thus, poor response findings probably require caution as to the interpretation as a susceptibility marker for ovarian response. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/06177-2 - Avaliação de mutações/polimorfismos em genes candidatos em mulheres inférteis e sua correlação com resultados de reprodução assistida
Beneficiário:Bianca Alves Vieira Bianco
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular