Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Platform-switching implants and bone preservation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Santiago Junior, J. F. [1] ; de Souza Batista, V. E. [2] ; Verri, F. R. [2] ; Honorio, H. M. [3] ; de Mello, C. C. [2] ; Almeida, D. A. dF. [2] ; Pellizzer, E. P. [2]
Número total de Autores: 7
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sagrado Coracao, Dept Hlth Sci, BR-17011160 Bauru, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Dent Sch Aragatuba, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Aracatuba, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Sci Methodol & Stat, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo de Revisão
Fonte: International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery; v. 45, n. 3, p. 332-345, MAR 2016.
Citações Web of Science: 19
Resumo

The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the possible benefits of platform-switching (PSW) implants when compared to regular platform (RP) implants in the categories of bone preservation and longevity. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in accordance with the PRISMA statement, PICO question, and Jadad scale. The relative risk (RR) of failure and the mean difference for marginal bone loss were calculated considering a confidence interval (CI) of 95%. Heterogeneity and subgroup analyses were performed, and funnel plots drawn. Twenty-five studies (17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and eight prospective studies) involving 1098 patients and 2310 implants were analysed. The meta-analysis revealed a significant reduction in crestal bone loss for PSW implants compared with RP implants (-0.41 mm, 95% CI -0.52 to -0.29, P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically significant difference in implant failure (RR 1.10, 95% CI 0.6-2.02, P = 0.75). A reduction in bone loss with PSW implants was observed for the following subgroups: RCTs only, implants in the maxilla, and implants in the mandible. PSW implants presented lower bone resorption compared with RP implants. RCTs should be done to explain the possible biases. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 10/15734-1 - Influência de diferentes superfícies de implantes osseointegrados unitários com geometria do tipo Hexágono Externo, Platform Switching e Cone - Morse em osso tipo III e IV. Estudo pelo método dos elementos finitos tridimensionais.
Beneficiário:Joel Ferreira Santiago Junior
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado