Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do SciELO, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Bond strength of bulk fill composite to teeth prepared with Er:YAG laser

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Marcos Roberto de Lima Benati [1] ; Jean Carlos Baioni [2] ; Amanda Guerra Cavalcante de Souza [3] ; Laura Nobre Ferraz [4] ; Ana Luisa Botta Martins de Oliveira [5] ; Rafael Pino Vitti [6] ; Renata Siqueira Scatolin [7]
Número total de Autores: 7
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
[2] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
[3] University of Campinas. Piracicaba School of Dentistry. Graduate Program in Clinical Dentistry - Brasil
[4] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
[5] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
[6] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
[7] Herminio Ometto University Center. School of Dentistry - Brasil
Número total de Afiliações: 7
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Braz. J. Oral Sci.; v. 22, 2023-01-16.
Resumo

Aim The present in vitro study aimed to evaluate the bond strength of a bulk fill composite on dentin surfaces prepared with the Er: YAG laser. Methods Twenty-four permanent third molars were selected and divided into 2 groups: CP - Conventional preparation with high-speed handpiece (control) and LA (laser) - Preparation with Er: YAG laser. The occlusal surface was removed to expose coronal dentin, which was subsequently prepared with a high-speed handpiece or Er: YAG laser (350mJ, 4Hz, 1.5 ml/min water flow). Both groups were restored with Filtek One Bulk Fill (3M ESPE) composite resin. After 24 hours, the samples were evaluated for microtensile bond strength (µTBS), fracture pattern, and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Results The data obtained in the µTBS test were submitted to t-test (α=0.05). The results showed no difference in µTBS when the different types of cavity preparation were compared (ρ=0.091). Fracture patterns revealed the prevalence of cohesive fracture in composite resin in CP (83.3%) and adhesive fracture in LA (92.1%). In the SEM analysis, the LA group demonstrated the presence of gaps between the composite resin and the irradiated dentin surface. The hybrid layer exhibited more regularity with the presence of longer and uniform resin tags in the CP group. Conclusion The type of cavity preparation did not influence the values of bulk fill composite resin µTBS to dentin. Fracture patterns and scanning electron microscopy analyses suggested less interference at the adhesive interface in preparations performed using CP. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 19/21055-4 - Avaliação da resistência de união de compósito Bulk Fill em dentes preparados com laser de er: YAG
Beneficiário:Marcos Roberto de Lima Benati
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica