Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

A photoelastic and strain gauge comparison of two attachments for obturator prostheses

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Goiato, Marcelo Coelho ; Matheus, Henrique Rinaldi ; de Medeiros, Rodrigo Antonio ; dos Santos, Daniela Micheline ; Bitencourt, Sandro Basso ; Pesqueira, Aldieris Alves
Número total de Autores: 6
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY; v. 117, n. 5, p. 685-689, MAY 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 2
Resumo

Statement of problem. The rehabilitation of patients after a maxillectomy involves the use of an obturator to seal oral-nasal-sinus communication and to facilitate mastication, swallowing, and speech. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate different attachment systems used for implant-retained obturators at dissipation loads and under shear forces. Material and methods. Photoelastic models were fabricated with 3 external hexagon implants at the incisor, canine, and first molar regions. Subsequently, overdentures were made, and metal hooks were placed at the incisor and first molar regions to displace the prostheses in the vertical, anterior, and posterior directions, with a constant speed of 50 mm/min. A photoelastic model with an O-ring or bar-clip system was placed in a circular polariscope, and tested with a universal testing machine. The images were recorded and high-intensity fringes were counted using software. For strain gauge analysis, each strain gauge was placed horizontally at the mesial and distal sides of the implants. The registered strains were submitted to 2-way ANOVA (alpha=.05). Results. The O-ring showed the lowest number of high-intensity fringes in photoelastic imaging, while the strain gauge analysis showed the lowest stress values in the bar-clip group (P=.007). Conclusions. The stress around titanium implant necks was more damaging to surrounding bone, while the bar-clip attachment system had a better biomechanical performance. The bar clip presented the lowest strain values around the dental implants and few high-intensity fringes. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/04919-1 - Análise da distribuição das tensões em próteses obturadoras palatinas implantorretidas em função do tipo de sistema de retenção quando submetidos a forças de tração: análise pela fotoelasticidade e extensometria
Beneficiário:Henrique Rinaldi Matheus
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica