Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Long-term profile attractiveness in Class II Division I malocclusion patients treated with and without extractions

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Mendes, Lucas Marzullo [1] ; Janson, Guilherme [1] ; Zingaretti Junqueira-Mendes, Cintia Helena [1] ; Garib, Daniela Gamba [1, 2]
Número total de Autores: 4
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Dent Sch, Dept Orthodont, Alameda Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Hosp Rehabil Craniofacial Anomalies, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS; v. 155, n. 3, p. 362-371, MAR 2019.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Introduction: This study evaluated the influence of Class II treatment protocols in profile attractiveness. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with initial full Class II Division 1 malocclusion, orthodontically treated an average of 15 years before, and matched by sex, age, time after treatment, orthodontic outcomes, and overjet, were compared. Three groups were formed, according to the treatment protocol: NE, nonextraction (n = 20; mean age 29.94 years, 15.62 years after treatment); 2E, 2-premolar extractions (n = 27; mean age 30.56 years, 15.09 years after treatment); and 4E, 4-premolar extractions (n = 21; mean age 32.29 years, 17.20 years after treatment). Cephalometric measurements and profile silhouettes were obtained from posttreatment and long-term posttreatment lateral cephalograms. With a 10-point numeric scale, 77 orthodontists and 77 laypeople rated profile attractiveness of each silhouette on a website.Results: The raters' posttreatment and long-term posttreatment scores, respectively, were: NE 4.76 and 4.32; 2E 5.35 and 5.08; and 4E 4.53 and 4.33. Conclusions: The posttreatment profile attractiveness was significantly higher in the 2E than in the 4E group, and in the NE group it was similar to the others. The long-term profile attractiveness in the 2E group was significantly greater compared with the NE and 4E groups. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 11/04603-6 - Influência em longo prazo dos protocolos de tratamento da Classe II na atratividade do perfil.
Beneficiário:Lucas Marzullo Mendes
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado