Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Olegario, Isabel Cristina [1] ; Hesse, Daniela [2, 1] ; Mendes, Fausto Medeiros [1] ; Bonifacio, Clarissa Calil [2] ; Raggio, Daniela Procida [1]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Paediat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Cariol Endodont & Pedodontol, Amsterdam - Netherlands
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS; v. 23, n. 4, p. 1761-1770, APR 2019.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

ObjectiveTo evaluate the survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC), compomer (COM), and glass carbomer (CAR) for occlusal and occlusoproximal cavitated dentin caries lesions in primary molars.MethodsA total of 568 4-7-year-old children (287 occlusoproximal and 281 occlusal cavities) were selected in Barueri, Brazil. The patients were randomly allocated in three groups: GIC, COM, and CAR. All treatments were performed on school setting following ART premises. Evaluations were performed after 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for testing association with clinical factors (=5%).ResultsThe overall survival rate after 3years of occlusal ART restorations was 73% (GIC=83%; COM=78%; CAR=62%) and 49% for occlusoproximal ART restorations (GIC=56%; COM=56%; CAR=36%). CAR restorations were less successful than GIC and COM for both occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations (p<0.05). No difference was found between GIC and COM (p>0.05).ConclusionsGIC and compomer are clinically more successful than CAR for occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations in primary molars.Clinical significanceBoth compomer and high viscosity glass ionomer cement are suitable materials for ART in primary molars. However, glass carbomer cement should not be used for ART (\#NCT02217098). (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 13/11236-5 - Longevidade de restaurações art em cavidades ocluso-proximais utilizando diferentes tipos de materiais
Beneficiário:Isabel Cristina Olegário da Costa
Linha de fomento: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado
Processo FAPESP: 15/00565-3 - Longevidade de restaurações art em cavidades ocluso-proximais e oclusais utilizando diferentes tipos de materiais restauradores - ensaio clinico randomizado
Beneficiário:Daniela Prócida Raggio
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular