Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial

Full text
Author(s):
Olegario, Isabel Cristina [1] ; Hesse, Daniela [2, 1] ; Mendes, Fausto Medeiros [1] ; Bonifacio, Clarissa Calil [2] ; Raggio, Daniela Procida [1]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Paediat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Acad Ctr Dent Amsterdam ACTA, Dept Cariol Endodont & Pedodontol, Amsterdam - Netherlands
Total Affiliations: 2
Document type: Journal article
Source: CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS; v. 23, n. 4, p. 1761-1770, APR 2019.
Web of Science Citations: 0
Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) restorations using high viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC), compomer (COM), and glass carbomer (CAR) for occlusal and occlusoproximal cavitated dentin caries lesions in primary molars.MethodsA total of 568 4-7-year-old children (287 occlusoproximal and 281 occlusal cavities) were selected in Barueri, Brazil. The patients were randomly allocated in three groups: GIC, COM, and CAR. All treatments were performed on school setting following ART premises. Evaluations were performed after 2, 6, 12, 18, 24, and 36months. Restoration survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test, while Cox regression analysis was used for testing association with clinical factors (=5%).ResultsThe overall survival rate after 3years of occlusal ART restorations was 73% (GIC=83%; COM=78%; CAR=62%) and 49% for occlusoproximal ART restorations (GIC=56%; COM=56%; CAR=36%). CAR restorations were less successful than GIC and COM for both occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations (p<0.05). No difference was found between GIC and COM (p>0.05).ConclusionsGIC and compomer are clinically more successful than CAR for occlusal and occlusoproximal restorations in primary molars.Clinical significanceBoth compomer and high viscosity glass ionomer cement are suitable materials for ART in primary molars. However, glass carbomer cement should not be used for ART (\#NCT02217098). (AU)

FAPESP's process: 13/11236-5 - APPROXIMAL ART RESTORATIONS USING DIFFERENT DENTAL MATERIALS
Grantee:Isabel Cristina Olegário da Costa
Support type: Scholarships in Brazil - Master
FAPESP's process: 15/00565-3 - ART RESTORATIONS LONGEVITY EM OCCLUSOPROXIMAL AND OCCLUSAL CAVITIES USING DIFFERENT RESTORATIVE MATERIALS - RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL
Grantee:Daniela Prócida Raggio
Support type: Regular Research Grants