Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do SciELO, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Response of molars and non-molars to a strict supragingival control in periodontal patients

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Patrícia Daniela Melchiors Angst [1] ; Flávia Benetti Piccinin [2] ; Rui Vicente Oppermann [3] ; Rosemary Adriana Chiérici Marcantonio [4] ; Sabrina Carvalho Gomes [5]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Department of Periodontology - Brasil
[2] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Department of Periodontology - Brasil
[3] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Department of Periodontology - Brasil
[4] Universidade Estadual Paulista. Department of Periodontology - Brasil
[5] Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul. Department of Periodontology - Brasil
Número total de Afiliações: 5
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Brazilian Oral Research; v. 27, n. 1, p. 55-60, 2013-02-00.
Resumo

The posterior position in the arches is one of the factors that underlies the poor prognosis of molar teeth (M). It is speculated that M do not benefit from the oral hygiene routine as well as non-molars (NM) do. This study evaluated the response of M and NM to supragingival control during a 6-month period in 25 smokers (S) and 25 never-smokers (NS) with moderate-to-severe periodontitis. One calibrated examiner assessed visible plaque (VPI) and gingival bleeding (GBI) indexes, periodontal probing depth (PPD), bleeding on probing (BOP), and clinical attachment loss (CAL) at days 0 (baseline), 30 and 180. At baseline, M showed significantly higher mean values of VPI (p = 0.017) and PPD (p < 0.001) compared with NM; CAL was also greater in M (p < 0.001) and was affected by smoking (p = 0.007). The reductions obtained for periodontal indicators at day 180 showed similar responses between M and NM. For CAL, M (NS 0.57 ± 0.50; S 0.67 ± 0.64) and NM (NS 0.38 ± 0.23; S 0.50 ± 0.33) reached an almost significant difference (p = 0.05). Smoking did not influence the response to treatment. Multilevel analysis revealed that, only for PDD reductions, the interaction between sites, teeth and patient was significant (p < 0.001). It was concluded that M benefit from an adequate regimen of supragingival biofilm control; therefore, supragingival condition should be considered in the prognosis of molar teeth. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 03/09302-8 - Avaliacao longitudinal do controle de placa bacteriana supragengival sobre parametros subgengivais: analise clinica, microbiologica e imunologica
Beneficiário:Rosemary Adriana Chierici Marcantonio
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular