Consensus on glass-ionomer cement thresholds for restorative indications

Autor(es):Mostrar menos -

de Lima Navarro, Maria Fidela ^[1] ; Pascotto, Renata Correa ^[2] ; Sanches Borges, Ana Flavia ^[1] ; Soares, Carlos Jose ^[3] ; Raggio, Daniela Procida ^[4] ; Rios, Daniela ^[1] ; Bresciani, Eduardo ^[5] ; Molina, Gustavo Fabian ^[6] ; Ngo, Hien Chi ; Miletic, Ivana ^[7] ; Frencken, Jo ^[8] ; Wang, Linda ^[1] ; Menezes-Silva, Rafael ^[1] ; Puppin-Rontani, Regina Maria ^[9] ; de Carvalho, Ricardo Marins ^[10] ; Gurgan, Sevil ^[11] ; Leal, Soraya Goelho ^[12] ; Tuzuner, Tamer ^[13] ; Fagundes, Ticiane Cestari ^[14] ; Nicholson, John William ^[15] ; Sidhu, Sharanbir Kaur ^[16]

Afiliação do(s) autor(es):Mostrar menos -

^[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Dept Restorat Dent, Bauru Sch Dent, Alameda Dr Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP - Brazil

^[2] Univ Estadual Maringa, Dept Restorat Dent, Av Colombo 5790 Jd, BR-87020900 Maringa, Parana - Brazil

^[3] Univ Fed Uberlandia, Dept Restorat Dent, Av Joao Naves Avila 2121, BR-38408100 Uberlandia, MG - Brazil

^[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, Av Prof Lineu Prestes 2227, BR-05508000 Butanta, SP - Brazil

^[5] State Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Sci & Technol, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, BR-1224500 Sao Jose Dos Campos - Brazil

^[6] Univ Catolica Cordoba, Obispo Trejo 323, X5000 IYG, Cordoba - Argentina

^[7] Univ Zagreb, Sch Dent Med, Gunduliceva Ul 5, Zagreb 10000 - Croatia

^[8] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent, Philips van Leydenlaan 25, NL-6525 EX Nijmegen - Netherlands

^[9] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Av Limeira 901, BR-13414903 Piracicaba - Brazil

^[10] Univ British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4 - Canada

^[11] Hacettepe Univ, Dept Restorat Dent, TR-06800 Ankara - Turkey

^[12] Univ Brasilia, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF - Brazil

^[13] Karadeniz Tek Univ, TR-61080 Trabzon - Turkey

^[14] State Univ Sao Paulo, Aracatuba Sch Dent, Rua Jose Bonifacio 1193, BR-16015050 Aracatuba - Brazil

^[15] Bluefield Ctr Biomat, Unit 34, 67-68 Hatton Garden, London EC1N 8JY - England

^[16] Queen Mary Univ London, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS - England

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: Journal of Dentistry; v. 107, APR 2021.
• Citações Web of Science: 0

Resumo

Objective: The aim of this paper is to present the results of a consensus meeting on the threshold property requirements for the clinical use of conventional glass-ionomer cements (GICs) for restorative indications. Methods: Twenty-one experts on GICs evaluated the results of tests on mechanical and optical properties of 18 different brands of restorative GICs: Bioglass R {[}B], Chemfil Rock {[}CR], Equia Forte {[}EF], Gold Label 2 {[}GL2], Gold Label 9 {[}GL9], Glass Ionomer Cement II {[}GI], Ionglass {[}IG], Ion Z {[}IZ], Ionomaster {[}IM], Ionofil Plus {[}IP], Ionostar Plus {[}IS], Ketac Molar Easymix {[}KM], Magic Glass {[}MG], Maxxion R {[}MA], Riva Self Cure {[}R], Vidrion R {[}V], Vitro Fil {[}VF] and Vitro Molar {[}VM]. All experiments were carried out by a team of researchers from Brazil and England following strict protocols, under the same laboratory conditions throughout, and maintaining data integrity. Results: There was consensus on: determining as primary properties of the material: compressive strength, microhardness, acid erosion and fluoride release, and as secondary properties: contrast ratio and translucency parameter, in order to rank the materials. Seven brands were below the thresholds for restorative indications: IZ, IM, IG, MA, VF, B and MG. Conclusions: Based on the primary properties adopted as being essential for restorative indications, the conventional restorative GICs that met the thresholds and could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials were: EF, GI, GL9, KM, IP, GL2, IS, CR, V, VM and R. A decision-making process to select the best GIC must also include results from clinical trials. Clinical significance: This study provides a ranking of GICs that could be considered suitable as long-term restorative materials based on their main properties. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 18/01616-9 - Reunião para consenso sobre a indicação dos cimentos de ionômeros de vidro restauradores quimicamente ativados
• Beneficiário: Maria Fidela de Lima Navarro
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio Organização - Reunião Científica