Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Influence of cosubstrate and hydraulic retention time on the removal of drugs and hygiene products in sanitary sewage in an anaerobic Expanded Granular Sludge Bed reactor

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Granatto, Caroline F. [1] ; Grosseli, Guilherme M. [2] ; Sakamoto, Isabel K. [1] ; Fadini, Pedro S. [2] ; Varesche, Maria Bernadete A. [1]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Carlos Sch Engn, Dept Hydraul & Sanitat, Ave Trabalhador Sao Carlense 400, BR-13566590 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Washington LuizHighway, Km 235, BR-13565905 Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Journal of Environmental Management; v. 299, DEC 1 2021.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Diclofenac (DCF), ibuprofen (IBU), propranolol (PRO), triclosan (TCS) and linear alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) can be recalcitrant in Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP). The removal of these compounds was investigated in scale-up (69 L) Expanded Granular Sludge Bed (EGSB) reactor, fed with sanitary sewage from the Sao Carlos SP (Brazil) WWTP and 200 mg L-1 of ethanol. The EGSB was operated in three phases: (I) hydraulic retention time (HRT) of 36 +/- 4 h; (II) HRT of 20 +/- 2 h and (III) HRT of 20 +/- 2 h with ethanol. Phases I and II showed no significant difference in the removal of LAS (63 +/- 11-65 +/- 12 %), DCF (37 +/- 18-35 +/- 11 %), IBU (43 +/- 18-44 +/- 16 %) and PRO (46 +/- 25-51 +/- 23 %) for 13 +/- 2-15 +/- 2 mg L-1, 106 +/- 32-462 +/- 294 mu g L-1, 166 +/- 55-462 +/- 213 mu g L-1 and 201 +/- 113-250 +/- 141 mu g L-1 influent, respectively. Higher TCS removal was obtained in phase I (72 +/- 17 % for 127 +/- 120 mu g L-1 influent) when compared to phase II (51 +/- 13 % for 135 +/- 119 mu g L-1 influent). This was due to its greater adsorption (40 %) in the initial phase. Phase III had higher removal of DCF (42 +/- 10 % for 107 +/- 26 mu g L-1 influent), IBU (50 +/- 15 % for 164 +/- 47 mu g L-1 influent) and TCS (85 +/- 15 % for 185 +/- 148 mu g L-1 influent) and lower removal of LAS (35 +/- 14 % for 12 +/- 3 mg L-1 influent) and PRO (-142 +/- 177 % for 188 +/- 88 mu g L-1 influent). Bacteria similar to Syntrophobacter, Smithella, Macellibacteroides, Syntrophus, Blvii28\_wastewater-sludge\_group and Bacteroides were identified in phase I with relative abundance of 3.1 %-4.7 %. Syntrophobacter was more abundant (15.4 %) in phase II, while in phase III, it was Smithella (12.7 %) and Caldisericum (15.1 %). Regarding the Archaea Domain, Methanosaeta was more abundant in phases I (84 %) and II (67 %), while in phase III it was Methanobacterium (86 %). (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/50951-4 - INCT 2014: Tecnologias Analíticas Avançadas
Beneficiário:Celio Pasquini
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Temático
Processo FAPESP: 15/02640-2 - Ampliação de escala de reator de leito fluidificado para tratamento de água residuária de lavanderia comercial combinada com esgoto sanitário: otimização das condições operacionais
Beneficiário:Thaís Zaninetti Macedo Carmelo
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado