| Texto completo | |
| Autor(es): |
van der Geest, Charlie
[1]
;
Bizarre, Leticia
[1]
;
Melchuna, Aline
[2]
;
Pinheiro, Ivanei F.
[1]
;
Guersoni, Vanessa C. B.
[1]
Número total de Autores: 5
|
| Afiliação do(s) autor(es): | [1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Ctr Petr Studies, Campinas, SP - Brazil
[2] Equinor Rio deJaneiro, Rio De Janeiro - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
|
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo Científico |
| Fonte: | FUEL; v. 313, APR 1 2022. |
| Citações Web of Science: | 0 |
| Resumo | |
Over the past five decades, wax deposition has been widely considered a mass transfer-controlled phenomenon. Despite the highly inaccurate predictions, engineers cannot accurately predict the final thickness of the deposit, the hypothesis that wax deposition is a mass transfer phenomenon was not commonly questioned, but this has recently changed. This paper shows evidence that wax deposition is limited by phase transition (heat transfer), by analyzing a vast experimental matrix previously presented in the literature and clearly showing that the thickness decreases as the Reynolds number increases, which cannot be explained by molecular diffusion alone, also by showing that the Reynolds number does not influence the ratio between the deposit's thermal resistance and the total thermal resistance (dimensionless temperature) for all cold flow experiments, which is further evidence of phase transition. When comparing the limits of the molecular diffusion approach with the experimental data, without any fitting parameter, one observes that not only the experimental data cannot be predicted, but the trend is also incorrect. When using the phase transition model (heat transfer), the accuracy in the thickness prediction is high, which is evidence that what limits the wax deposition is the phase transition. This shows that heat transfer equations can accurately predict wax deposition thickness. Since all wax deposition simulators have the heat transfer calculations, to improve their predictions, one must only implement a single boundary condition. (AU) | |
| Processo FAPESP: | 17/15736-3 - Centro de Pesquisa em Engenharia em Reservatórios e Gerenciamento de Produção de Petróleo |
| Beneficiário: | Denis José Schiozer |
| Modalidade de apoio: | Auxílio à Pesquisa - Programa Centros de Pesquisa em Engenharia |