Weight Concerns Scale Applied to College Students: Comparison Between Pencil-and-Paper and Online Formats

Autor(es)

Ribeiro Dias, Juliana Chioda ^[1] ; Maroco, Joao ^[2] ; Duarte Bonini Campos, Juliana Alvares ^[1]

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Univ Estadual Paulista UNESP, Fac Ciencias Farmaceut, Sao Paulo - Brazil

^[2] UIPES ISPA, Inst Univ, Unidade Invest Psicol & Saude, Lisbon - Portugal

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING; v. 18, n. 3, p. 188-192, MAR 1 2015.
• Citações Web of Science: 5

Resumo

Online data collection is becoming increasingly common and has some advantages compared to traditional paper-and-pencil formats, such as reducing loss of data, increasing participants' privacy, and decreasing the effect of social desirability. However, the validity and reliability of this administration format must be established before results can be considered acceptable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity, reliability, and equivalence of paper-and-pencil and online versions of the Weight Concerns Scale (WCS) when applied to Brazilian university students. A crossover design was used, and the Portuguese version of the WCS (in both paper-and-pencil and online formats) was completed by 100 college students. The results indicated adequate fit in both formats. The simultaneous fit of data for both groups was excellent, with strong invariance between models. Adequate convergent validity, internal consistency, and mean score equivalence of the WCS in both formats were observed. Thus, the WCS presented adequate reliability and validity in both administration formats, with equivalence/stability between answers. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 10/18279-3 - Estudo de validação das escalas de percepção de peso e de estresse percebido
• Beneficiário: Juliana Alvares Duarte Bonini Campos
• Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular