Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Nasal lavage, blood or sputum: Which is best for phenotyping asthma?

Texto completo
Autor(es):
de Farias, Camyla F. ; Amorim, Maria M. F. ; Dracoulakis, Michel ; Caetano, Lilian B. ; Santoro, Ilka L. ; Fernandes, Ana L. G.
Número total de Autores: 6
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Respirology; v. 22, n. 4, p. 671-677, MAY 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 3
Resumo

Background and objectiveDetermination of asthma phenotypes, particularly inflammatory phenotypes, helps guide treatment and management of this heterogeneous disease. Induced sputum cytology has been the gold standard for determination of inflammatory phenotypes, but sputum induction is fairly invasive and technically challenging. Blood and nasal lavage cytology have been suggested as substitutes, but have not been fully verified. The aim of this study is to determine the accuracy of blood and nasal lavage cytometry as indicators of inflammatory phenotypes in asthma. MethodsClinical evaluation, Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and spirometry were performed for 121 adult asthma patients, and blood, nasal lavage and induced sputum samples were taken. Eosinophils and neutrophils were counted in three samples from each subject. Inflammatory phenotypes (eosinophilic, neutrophilic, mixed and paucicellular) and cells counts were analysed using Venn diagram and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively. Results ACQ score, spirometry and bronchodilator response did not differ among subjects with different inflammatory phenotypes. Inflammatory phenotypes defined by nasal lavage cytometry were in better concordance than those defined by blood cell counts with phenotypes determined by sputum cytology, and were significantly correlated with sputum phenotypes. For eosinophilia, nasal lavage cytology showed better accuracy than blood cytology (area under the curve (AUC): 0.89 vs 0.65). For all phenotypes, sensitivity and positive and negative predictive power were higher for nasal lavage cytometry than for blood. Blood cell counts gave a high level of false positives for all inflammatory phenotypes. ConclusionWe recommend nasal lavage cytology over blood cell count as a substitute for sputum cytology to identify inflammatory phenotypes in asthma. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 12/11396-0 - Revisão da coorte de asmáticos regularmente tratados, quanto ao processo inflamatório, espirometria e terapia de manutenção e risco futuro em asma (REPITA)
Beneficiário:Ana Luisa Godoy Fernandes
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular
Processo FAPESP: 15/21177-1 - Protocolo de investigação de asmáticos tratados e sua relação clínico funcional com a biologia molecular do sistema imune
Beneficiário:Ana Luisa Godoy Fernandes
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular