Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Comparison of two species-specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Cerejo, Sofia A. ; Teixeira-Neto, Francisco J. ; Garofalo, Natache A. ; Rodrigues, Jessica C. ; Celeita-Rodriguez, Nathalia ; Lagos-Carvajal, Angie P.
Número total de Autores: 6
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE; v. 27, n. 4, p. 409-418, JUL-AUG 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 4
Resumo

Objective - To compare the performance of 2 species-specific oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) monitors (petMAPclassic and petMAPgraphic) with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. Design - Prospective, experimental study. Setting - Veterinary teaching hospital. Animals - Eight adult cats (3.2-5.5 kg). Interventions - During isoflurane anesthesia, OBP cuffs were placed on the thoracic limb and on the base of the tail while invasive blood pressure (IBP) was recorded from a dorsal pedal artery. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations, with orwithout intravenous dopamine (n = 8), norepinephrine (n = 1), or phenylephrine (n = 1) were adjusted to change invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 40 to 100 mm Hg. Data were analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and 4-quadrant plots. Measurements and Main Results - Mean biases and limits of agreement (LOA: +/- 1.96 SD) (mm Hg) recorded between the petMAPclassic (thoracic limb) and IBP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and MAP were 4.2 +/- 28.5, -6.1 +/- 13.2, and -1.9 +/- 14.6, respectively; mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) recorded with the tail cuff were 7.2 +/- 31.3 (SAP), -6.1 +/- 11.6 (DAP), and -1.1 +/- 11.7 (MAP). Mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) between petMAPgraphic (thoracic limb) and IBP were 7.7 +/- 27.0 (SAP), -4.3 +/- 11.5 (DAP), 0.2 +/- 13.0 (MAP); values recorded with the tail cuff were 10.9 +/- 29.6 (SAP), -4.4 +/- 11.7 (DAP), and -0.1 +/- 12.1 (MAP). Concordance rates after excluding arterial pressure changes <= 5 mmHg was >= 93% for both devices. Conclusions - Although both OBP monitors provide unacceptable SAP estimations, MAP values derived from both monitors and DAP measured by the petMAPgraphic result in acceptable agreement with the reference method according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (mean bias <= 5 mmHg with LOA <= +/- 16 mm Hg). Both monitors provide acceptable trending ability for SAP, DAP, and MAP. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 12/09837-8 - Avaliação de métodos estimativos da pressão arterial direta em gatos anestesiados com isofluorano: otimização da acurácia do Doppler ultrasônico e avaliação da performance de um novo monitor oscilométrico
Beneficiário:Francisco José Teixeira Neto
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular