Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
(Reference retrieved automatically from Web of Science through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Comparison of two species-specific oscillometric blood pressure monitors with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats

Full text
Author(s):
Cerejo, Sofia A. ; Teixeira-Neto, Francisco J. ; Garofalo, Natache A. ; Rodrigues, Jessica C. ; Celeita-Rodriguez, Nathalia ; Lagos-Carvajal, Angie P.
Total Authors: 6
Document type: Journal article
Source: JOURNAL OF VETERINARY EMERGENCY AND CRITICAL CARE; v. 27, n. 4, p. 409-418, JUL-AUG 2017.
Web of Science Citations: 4
Abstract

Objective - To compare the performance of 2 species-specific oscillometric blood pressure (OBP) monitors (petMAPclassic and petMAPgraphic) with direct blood pressure measurement in anesthetized cats. Design - Prospective, experimental study. Setting - Veterinary teaching hospital. Animals - Eight adult cats (3.2-5.5 kg). Interventions - During isoflurane anesthesia, OBP cuffs were placed on the thoracic limb and on the base of the tail while invasive blood pressure (IBP) was recorded from a dorsal pedal artery. End-tidal isoflurane concentrations, with orwithout intravenous dopamine (n = 8), norepinephrine (n = 1), or phenylephrine (n = 1) were adjusted to change invasive mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 40 to 100 mm Hg. Data were analyzed by the Bland-Altman method and 4-quadrant plots. Measurements and Main Results - Mean biases and limits of agreement (LOA: +/- 1.96 SD) (mm Hg) recorded between the petMAPclassic (thoracic limb) and IBP for systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), and MAP were 4.2 +/- 28.5, -6.1 +/- 13.2, and -1.9 +/- 14.6, respectively; mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) recorded with the tail cuff were 7.2 +/- 31.3 (SAP), -6.1 +/- 11.6 (DAP), and -1.1 +/- 11.7 (MAP). Mean biases and LOA (mm Hg) between petMAPgraphic (thoracic limb) and IBP were 7.7 +/- 27.0 (SAP), -4.3 +/- 11.5 (DAP), 0.2 +/- 13.0 (MAP); values recorded with the tail cuff were 10.9 +/- 29.6 (SAP), -4.4 +/- 11.7 (DAP), and -0.1 +/- 12.1 (MAP). Concordance rates after excluding arterial pressure changes <= 5 mmHg was >= 93% for both devices. Conclusions - Although both OBP monitors provide unacceptable SAP estimations, MAP values derived from both monitors and DAP measured by the petMAPgraphic result in acceptable agreement with the reference method according to the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (mean bias <= 5 mmHg with LOA <= +/- 16 mm Hg). Both monitors provide acceptable trending ability for SAP, DAP, and MAP. (AU)

FAPESP's process: 12/09837-8 - Evaluation of indirect blood pressure monitors in isoflurane anesthetized cats: optimization of Doppler accuracy and evaluation of the performance of a new oscillometric monitor
Grantee:Francisco José Teixeira Neto
Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants