Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do SciELO, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis: compression tests

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Rafael Tobias Moretti Neto [1] ; Daniel Afonso Hiramatsu ; Valdey Suedam ; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti [4] ; José Henrique Rubo [5]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Federal University of Alfenas. Dental School. Department of Clinics and Surgery - Brasil
[4] University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics - Brasil
[5] University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics - Brasil
Número total de Afiliações: 5
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 19, n. 1, p. 47-51, 2011-02-00.
Resumo

OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implant-supported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K - 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A - 389.72 MPa, Group B - 529.19 MPa, Group C - 571.11 MPa, Group D - 470.35 MPa, Group E - 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 06/57414-8 - Validacao de um modelo experimental de poliuretano para estudo biomecanico em protese implanto-suportada.
Beneficiário:Mariane Miyashiro
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica