Advanced search
Start date
Betweenand
Related content
(Reference retrieved automatically from SciELO through information on FAPESP grant and its corresponding number as mentioned in the publication by the authors.)

Validation of an experimental polyurethane model for biomechanical studies on implant-supported prosthesis: compression tests

Full text
Author(s):
Rafael Tobias Moretti Neto [1] ; Daniel Afonso Hiramatsu ; Valdey Suedam ; Paulo César Rodrigues Conti [4] ; José Henrique Rubo [5]
Total Authors: 5
Affiliation:
[1] Federal University of Alfenas. Dental School. Department of Clinics and Surgery - Brasil
[4] University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics - Brasil
[5] University of São Paulo. Bauru School of Dentistry. Department of Prosthodontics - Brasil
Total Affiliations: 5
Document type: Journal article
Source: Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 19, n. 1, p. 47-51, 2011-02-00.
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The complexity and heterogeneity of human bone, as well as ethical issues, most always hinder the performance of clinical trials. Thus, in vitro studies become an important source of information for the understanding of biomechanical events on implant-supported prostheses, although study results cannot be considered reliable unless validation studies are conducted. The purpose of this work was to validate an artificial experimental model based on its modulus of elasticity, to simulate the performance of human bone in vivo in biomechanical studies of implant-supported prostheses. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this study, fast-curing polyurethane (F16 polyurethane, Axson) was used to build 40 specimens that were divided into five groups. The following reagent ratios (part A/part B) were used: Group A (0.5/1.0), Group B (0.8/1.0), Group C (1.0/1.0), Group D (1.2/1.0), and Group E (1.5/1.0). A universal testing machine (Kratos model K - 2000 MP) was used to measure modulus of elasticity values by compression. RESULTS: Mean modulus of elasticity values were: Group A - 389.72 MPa, Group B - 529.19 MPa, Group C - 571.11 MPa, Group D - 470.35 MPa, Group E - 437.36 MPa. CONCLUSION: The best mechanical characteristics and modulus of elasticity value comparable to that of human trabecular bone were obtained when A/B ratio was 1:1. (AU)