The abstract versus the concrete: differing opinions of medical residents in obstetrics and gynaecology about abortion and punishment of abortion

Autor(es):Mostrar menos -

Bento, Silvana Ferreira ^{[1, 2]} ; Pacagnella, Rodolfo de Carvalho ^[3] ; Faundes, Anibal ^{[3, 2]} ; de Padua, Karla Simonia ^{[1, 2]} ; Fernandes, Karayna Gil ^{[1, 4]} ; Araujo, Danielle Miyamoto ^[1] ; Fahl, Isabela Dias ^[1] ; Duarte Osis, Maria Jose ^{[3, 4]} ; Duarte, Graciana Alves ^[2] ; Santos de Menezes, Carlos Augusto ; Medeiros Paiva, Claudio Sergio ; do Nascimento, Denis Jose ; Pereira Rocha da Silva, Edilberto Alves ; Dantas Moises, Elaine Christine ; Henrique Lotufo, Fatima Aparecida ; Carvalho Bastos, Fernando Artur ; de Lucena Feitosa, Francisco Edson ; Machado Viana, Francisco Jose ; Pereira de Sousa, Francisco Lazar ; Brum, Ione Rodrigues ; de Castro Moreira, Joaquim Luiz ; de Souza Lima, Marcelo Marques ; Correa Junior, Mario Dias ; dos Santos Rocha, Marla Niag ; Sass, Nelson ; de Moraes Filho, Olimpio Barbosa ; Mattar, Rosiane ; Quintana, Silvana Maria ; Medeiros Borges, Vera Therezinha ; Coelho, Yalli ; Grp, Brazilian Abortion Study

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Prof Jose Aristodemo Pinotti Womens Hosp, Ctr Integral Attent Womens Hlth CAISM, Campinas, SP - Brazil

^[2] Campinas Ctr Res Human Reprod CEMICAMP, Campinas, SP - Brazil

^[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Campinas, SP - Brazil

^[4] Sch Med Jundiai, Jundiai, SP - Brazil

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTRACEPTION AND REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH CARE; v. 24, n. 6, p. 494-500, NOV 2 2019.
• Citações Web of Science: 0

Resumo

Purpose: To investigate the opinions of Brazilian medical residents in Obstetrics and Gynaecology on abortion legislation according to their personal beliefs. Material and methods: A multicentre cross-sectional study. Residents at 21 university teaching hospitals completed a self-report questionnaire on their opinions in abstract terms, and about punishing women who abort in general and women they know. Results: In abstract terms, 8% favoured allowing abortion under any circumstances (fully liberal); 36% under socioeconomic or psychological constraints (broadly liberal); 75.3% opposed punishing a woman who has aborted (liberal in general practice); and 90.2% opposed punishing women they knew personally (liberal in personal practice). Not having a stable partner and not being influenced by religion were factors associated with liberal opinions. In personal practice, however, 80% of those who are influenced by religion were liberal. The percentage of respondents whose opinions were liberal was significantly greater among those who believed that abortion rates would remain the same or decrease following liberalisation. Conclusions: Judgements regarding the penalisation of women who abort are strongly influenced by how close the respondent is to the problem. Accurate information on abortion needs to be provided. Although about one third of the respondents were broadly liberal, the majority oppose punishment. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 12/23129-6 - Aborto medicamentoso: conhecimento, atitude e prática de médicos residentes em ginecologia e obstetrícia
• Beneficiário: Anibal Eusébio Faúndes Latham
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular