Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Comparison of five different laboratory techniques for the rabies diagnosis in clinically suspected cattle in Brazil

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Mostrar menos -
Centoamore, N. H. F. [1] ; Chierato, M. E. R. [1] ; Silveira, V. B. V. [2] ; Asano, K. M. [2] ; Iamamoto, K. [2] ; Fahl, W. O. [2] ; Scheffer, K. C. [2] ; Achkar, S. M. [2] ; Mesquita, L. P. [1] ; Maiorka, P. C. [1] ; Mori, E. [1, 2]
Número total de Autores: 11
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Vet Med & Anim Sci, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
[2] Inst Pasteur Sao Paulo, Ave Paulista 393, BR-01311000 Sao Paulo, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Journal of Virological Methods; v. 283, SEP 2020.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

The direct-fluorescent antibody test (dFAT) is considered the ``gold standard{''} assay to diagnose rabies. However, it is crucial to develop molecular techniques, such as RT-PCR and RT-qPCR, since many laboratories lack the needed supplies for performing complementary methods (viral isolation, for example). For this purpose, diagnostic techniques must be specific and sensitive to guarantee accuracy. This present investigation aimed to detect rabies virus (RABV) in 126 clinically suspected cattle in Brazil using different diagnostic tests {[}dFAT, mouse inoculation test (MIT), immunohistochemistry (IHC), RT-PCR and RT-qPCR] and to compare those results obtained under routine laboratory conditions. The results of the present investigation demonstrate that the molecular techniques are more sensitive and may detect low viral load, even though the non-homogeneous viral distribution caused a false-negative result in dFAT. We also observed a usual alteration in antigens distribution among regions of the central nervous system (CNS). By both dFAT and IHC assays, the most reliable CNS structures were thalamus and midbrain. Although this investigation demonstrated diagnostic sensitivity and specificity close to 100 % in all laboratory techniques employed, a dFAT auxiliary test is required for bovine specimens, such as molecular techniques, when there are poor sampling conditions (low viral load combined with unavailability of brainstem structures). (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 15/17807-0 - Estudo da neuroinvasividade e neurovirulência do vírus da raiva em amostras de sistema nervoso central de bovinos
Beneficiário:Enio Mori
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular