Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Determination of Maximum Accumulated Oxygen Deficit Using Backward Extrapolation

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Andrade, Vitor Luiz [1, 2] ; Kalva-Filho, Carlos Augusto [3] ; Ribeiro, Nayan Xavier [4] ; Gobbi, Ronaldo Bucken ; de Arruda, Tarine Botta [4] ; Papoti, Marcelo [5]
Número total de Autores: 6
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista Julio Mesquita Filho Campu, Inst Biociencias UNESP, Rio Claro - Brazil
[2] Ctr Univ UNIFAFIBE, Phys Educ, Bebedouro - Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Rehabil & Funct Performance, Ribeirao Preto - Brazil
[4] USP EEFERP, Phys Educ, Ribeirao Preto - Brazil
[5] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Phys Educ & Sport Ribeirao Preto, Ribeirao Preto - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 5
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE; v. 42, n. 02 SEP 2020.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

This study aimed to compare the Maximum Accumulated Oxygen Deficit determined by the conventional method (MAOD(C)) with that determined by the backward extrapolation technique (MAOD(EXTR)) in runners. Fourteen runners underwent a maximal incremental test for determination of iVO(2MAX), ten submaximal efforts (50-95 % of iVO(2MAX) for 7 min). During the submaximal efforts oxygen consumption (VO2) values were obtained conventionally and through the backward extrapolation technique (similar to 3 s after the end of each effort). A supramaximal effort (110 % of iVO(2MAX)) (tLim(C)) and five supramaximal bouts (tLim(EXTR)) were performed. MAOD(C) and MAOD(EXTR) were determined from the difference between the VO2 accumulated during tLimC and tLim(EXTR) and the predicted values. The tLimC was lower than tLim(EXTR) (164.06 +/- 36.32 s, 200.23 +/- 63.78 s, p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between absolute and relative MAOD(C) and MAOD(EXTR) values, however, low intraclass correlations (0.26 and 0.24), high typical errors (2.03 L and 24 mL.kg(-1)) were observed, and coefficients of variation (46 and 48 %), respectively. The graphical analysis of the differences showed agreement and correlation between the methods (r = 0.86 and 0.85). Thus, it can be concluded that the MAOD(EXTR) is not a valid method for estimating the anaerobic capacity of runners, moreover, unreliable. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 13/15322-3 - Determinação do máximo déficit acumulado de oxigênio por meio da técnica de retro extrapolação em nadadores, corredores e ciclistas
Beneficiário:Marcelo Papoti
Linha de fomento: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular