What are the facilitators and barriers to develop a running-related injury prevention program? A qualitative study

Autor(es)

de Oliveira, Gabriela Martins ^[1] ; Kretli Mota, Giovana Araujo ^[1] ; Vallio, Caio Sain ^[1] ; Lopes, Alexandre Dias ^[2] ; Hespanhol, Luiz ^{[1, 3, 4]}

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Univ Cidade Sao Paulo UNICID, Masters & Doctoral Programs Phys Therapy, BR-03071000 Sao Paulo - Brazil

^[2] Northeastern Univ, Dept Phys Therapy Movement & Rehabil Sci, Boston, MA 02115 - USA

^[3] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Publ & Occupat Hlth DPOH, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst APH, Med Ctr, Locat VU, Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam VUmc, Amsterdam - Netherlands

^[4] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Collaborat Hlth & Safety Sports ACHSS, Amsterdam Movement Sci, Med Ctr, Locat VU, Univ Med Ctr Amsterdam VUmc, Amsterdam - Netherlands

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE; SEP 2021.
• Citações Web of Science: 0

Resumo

Background : Knowing the facilitators and barriers of the development process of prevention programs in advance may prevent setbacks to occur and may even enable strategies to explore the facilitators and to deal with and/or avoid possible barriers. Objective : To investigate the facilitators and barriers of the development process of a running-related injury (RRI) prevention program. Methods : This was a qualitative study conducted with semi-structured face-to-face interviews with participants from the development of the RunIn3 RRI prevention program. The analysis on facilitators and barriers was performed following a content analysis approach. All participants enrolled in the development of the RunIn3 program were invited to participate in this study (n = 10). The interviews were conducted and recorded until saturation. Qualitative data from interview transcripts were grouped into condensed meaning units, codes, categories and themes, and were analyzed descriptively. Results : Nine participants were included in this study. Overall, 17 categories were identified: six facilitators (35.3%) and 11 barriers (64.7%). The facilitators were reported 55.1% of the time (frequency of emerging themes {[}FET] = 43/78) and the barriers were reported 44.9% of the time (FET = 35/78). The most frequent categories classified as facilitators were `group meeting' (32.6%, FET = 14/43) and `form of contact' (20.9%, FET = 9/43). The most frequent categories classified as barriers were `absence of participants' (22.9%, FET = 8/35) and `ramblings' (20.0%, FET = 7/35). Conclusion : The facilitators were more frequently reported than the barriers related to the development of the RRI prevention program, based on FET. These results may help in future endeavors toward the development of sports injury prevention programs. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 17/14552-6 - Facilitadores e barreiras relacionados ao desenvolvimento de um programa de prevenção de lesões relacionadas à corrida
• Beneficiário: Giovana Araujo Kretli Mota
• Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica
• Processo FAPESP: 18/03715-4 - Desenvolvimento de um programa de prevenção de lesões relacionadas à corrida
• Beneficiário: Gabriela Martins de Oliveira
• Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado
• Processo FAPESP: 17/11665-4 - Avaliação do processo de implementação de um programa de prevenção de lesões relacionadas à corrida
• Beneficiário: Caio Sain Vallio
• Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado Direto
• Processo FAPESP: 16/09220-1 - Avaliação do processo de desenvolvimento e implementação de um programa de prevenção de lesões da corrida
• Beneficiário: Luiz Carlos Hespanhol Junior
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Jovens Pesquisadores