Short Period Baited Remote Underwater Video as a cost-benefit tool to evaluate effectiveness of Marine No-take Zones

Autor(es)

Marcos F Tomasi ^[1] ; Linda G Waters ^[2] ; Igor C. S Cruz ; Arthur Z Güth ^[4] ; Alexander Turra ^[5]

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto Oceanográfico - Brasil

^[2] Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto Oceanográfico - Brasil

^[4] Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto Oceanográfico - Brasil

^[5] Universidade de São Paulo. Instituto Oceanográfico - Brasil

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: Ocean and Coastal Research; v. 70, 2022-04-22.

Resumo

Abstract Evaluating effectiveness of marine No-take Zones (NTZ) can be cost or labor prohibitive, thus comparisons to nearby unprotected areas are typically lacking. Two NTZs were evaluated, the waters surrounding Ilha Anchieta State Park and Palmas Island in Ubatuba, São Paulo, Brazil, for species richness, diversity, and abundance of ichthyofauna, comparing them with two nearby unprotected “Take” Zones. From 23 deployments using Baited Remote Underwater Video (BRUV), 737 individuals from 51 species of fish were recorded. The NTZ community composition was significantly different from Take Zones, with higher average species richness, abundance, and diversity but similar evenness. Seven species, accounting for more than 72% of the composition differences between Take and NTZs, were more abundant in NTZs. Comparisons of individual sites within each zone showed high variability for the Mar Virado Take Zone, with one site grouped with NTZs at 30% similarity. In parallel, BRUV deployed over a short period was assessed as a potential rapid, low-cost method for analyzing the effectiveness of a marine protected area, important for management of sites in low- and middle-income countries with patchy resource availability. BRUV distinguished significant community structure differences between Take and NTZs, with no difference between sites within each classification. Comparing with BRUV conducted for a longer period at two of the four study sites (MV and PA), our rapid study recorded 44.3% of total species using 28% of the survey effort. Compared with a multi-method survey as a proxy for a record of all potential species present at a third site (AI), BRUV recorded 30% of total species using 4.2% of the survey effort. BRUV showed bias towards size classes >15cm and certain feeding strategies, important to note if assessing a single target species. Overall, this rapid implementation of BRUV showed a clear difference between sites that differed in fishing protection level. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 14/17815-0 - Desenvolvimento metodológico para detecção de mudanças de fase em recifes de corais a partir de sensores ópticos instalados em drone
• Beneficiário: Igor Cristino Silva Cruz
• Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Pós-Doutorado