Validation of physician certified verbal autopsy using conventional autopsy: a large study of adult non-external causes of death in a metropolitan area in Brazil

Autor(es):Mostrar menos -

Saldiva de Andre, Carmen Diva ; Bierrenbach, Ana Luiza ; Barroso, Lucia Pereira ; de Andre, Paulo Afonso ; Justo, Lisie Tocci ; Amador Pereira, Luiz Alberto ; Taniguchi, Mauro T. ; Minto, Catia Martinez ; Takecian, Pedro Losco ; Kamaura, Leonardo Tadashi ; Ferreira, Joao Eduardo ; Hazard, Riley H. ; Mclaughlin, Deirdre ; Riley, Ian ; Lopez, Alan D. ; de Oliveira Ramos, Ana Maria ; Marinho de Souza, Maria de Fatima ; Franca, Elisabeth Barboza ; Nascimento Saldiva, Paulo Hilario ; Ferraz da Silva, Luiz Fernando

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: BMC PUBLIC HEALTH; v. 22, n. 1, p. 11-pg., 2022-04-14.

Resumo

Background Reliable mortality data are essential for the development of public health policies. In Brazil, although there is a well-consolidated universal system for mortality data, the quality of information on causes of death (CoD) is not even among Brazilian regions, with a high proportion of ill-defined CoD. Verbal autopsy (VA) is an alternative to improve mortality data. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of an adapted and reduced version of VA in identifying the underlying causes of non-forensic deaths, in Sao Paulo, Brazil. This is the first time that a version of the questionnaire has been validated considering the autopsy as the gold standard. Methods The performance of a physician-certified verbal autopsy (PCVA) was evaluated considering conventional autopsy (macroscopy plus microscopy) as gold standard, based on a sample of 2060 decedents that were sent to the Post-Mortem Verification Service (SVOC-USP). All CoD, from the underlying to the immediate, were listed by both parties, and ICD-10 attributed by a senior coder. For each cause, sensitivity and chance corrected concordance (CCC) were computed considering first the underlying causes attributed by the pathologist and PCVA, and then any CoD listed in the death certificate given by PCVA. Cause specific mortality fraction accuracy (CSMF-accuracy) and chance corrected CSMF-accuracy were computed to evaluate the PCVA performance at the populational level. Results There was substantial variability of the sensitivities and CCC across the causes. Well-known chronic diseases with accurate diagnoses that had been informed by physicians to family members, such as various cancers, had sensitivities above 40% or 50%. However, PCVA was not effective in attributing Pneumonia, Cardiomyopathy and Leukemia/Lymphoma as underlying CoD. At populational level, the PCVA estimated cause specific mortality fractions (CSMF) may be considered close to the fractions pointed by the gold standard. The CSMF-accuracy was 0.81 and the chance corrected CSMF-accuracy was 0.49. Conclusions The PCVA was efficient in attributing some causes individually and proved effective in estimating the CSMF, which indicates that the method is useful to establish public health priorities. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 13/21728-2 - Uso de modernas técnicas de autópsia na investigação de doenças humanas (MODAU)
• Beneficiário: Paulo Hilário Nascimento Saldiva
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Temático