Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Patient comfort in periapical examination using digital receptors

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Goncalves, A. [1] ; Wiezel, V. G. ; Goncalves, M. ; Hebling, J. [2] ; Sannomiya, E. K. [3]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, FOAr, UNESP, Dept Oral Diag & Surg, Araraquara Dent Sch, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP - Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ, Araraquara Dent Sch, UNESP, Dept Orthodont & Pediat Dent, BR-14801903 Araraquara, SP - Brazil
[3] Sao Paulo Metodista Univ, Sch Dent, Dept DentoMaxilloFacial Radiol, Sao Bernardo Do Campo, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Dentomaxillofacial Radiology; v. 38, n. 7, p. 484-488, OCT 2009.
Citações Web of Science: 6
Resumo

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare digital and conventional radiography with regard to patient comfort during periapical radiographic examination. Methods: 300 patients were submitted to a simulation of a radiographic periapical examination of a dentate region using conventional intraoral radiographic film (Kodak Insight) with and without the use of an RINK film holder, a Schick charge-coupled device (CCD) sensor, a Visualix CCD sensor and a Denoptix phosphor plate. The patients were asked to score how they felt in terms of comfort on a 100 mm visual analogue scale. The Wilcoxon test (alpha = 0.05) was applied to compare the comfort score of different types of imaging receptor from each simulated radiographic region reported by the patients. Results: The median of the ``comfort data{''} according to the type of imaging receptor was 40 mm for conventional intraoral radiographic film with the use of the film holder, 85 mm for conventional intraoral radiographic film without the film holder, 80 mm for Schick and Visualix receptors, and 90 mm for the Denoptix receptor. Conclusions: Denoptix was the most comfortable imaging receptor, followed in decreasing order by Schick and Visualix, conventional intraoral radiographic film without using the film holder and conventional intraoral radiographic film with a film holder. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (2009) 38, 484-488. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/82025587 (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 99/03026-1 - Desenvolvimento da periimplantite induzida por ligadura em diferentes superfícies de implantes osseointegrados: análise clínica e radiográfica em cães
Beneficiário:Elcio Marcantonio Junior
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular
Processo FAPESP: 05/02389-6 - Desconforto do paciente em exame radiográfico periapical digital
Beneficiário:Valnici Giseli Wiezel
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica