Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Connective tissue graft and tunnel or trapezoidal flap for the treatment of single maxillary gingival recessions: a randomized clinical trial

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine ; da Silva Neves, Felipe Lucas ; Silveira, Camila Augusto ; Mathias, Ingrid Fernandes ; Fernandes-Dias, Stephanie Botti ; Neves Jardini, Maria Aparecida ; Tatakis, Dimitris N.
Número total de Autores: 7
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY; v. 44, n. 5, p. 540-547, MAY 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 7
Resumo

BackgroundAlthough ample evidence supports connective tissue graft (CTG) use for root coverage, there is need for research on recipient site preparation approaches. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of trapezoidal coronally advanced flap (CAF) and coronally advanced tunnel flap (TUN) when used in conjunction with CTG. MethodsForty-two patients presenting 42 single maxillary, Miller Class I and II, gingival recession defects were randomly assigned to receive either CAF+CTG (N=21) or TUN+CTG (N=21). Clinical, patient-centred, and aesthetic outcomes were assessed. ResultsSix months postoperatively, both groups resulted in significant reduction in recession depth and increases in keratinized tissue thickness and width. CAF+CTG and TUN+CTG mean root coverage was 87.227.1% and 77.4 +/- 20.4% respectively (p=0.02). Complete root coverage was achieved in 71.4% and 28.6% of defects treated with CAF+CTG and TUN+CTG respectively (p=0.01). At 7days postoperatively, TUN+CTG patients reported significantly less pain experience (p=0.04). Both approaches reduced dentine hypersensitivity by approximately 85% (p<0.05). Patient-based aesthetic evaluation indicated significant improvement for both groups. Although patient- and professional-based aesthetic assessments revealed no differences between groups, tissue texture was significantly better for TUN+CTG (p=0.02). ConclusionsFor root coverage of single maxillary recession defects, CAF+CTG was more effective than TUN+CTG (ClinicalTrial.org-NCT02814279). (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/00119-0 - Comparação de dois tipos de retalho para enxerto de tecido conjuntivo no tratamento de recessões gengivais: estudo clínico randomizado
Beneficiário:Felipe Lucas da Silva Neves
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado
Processo FAPESP: 15/14119-5 - Avaliação da influência do arco e da projeção vestibular das raízes, medidas por meio de tomografia computadorizada, no recobrimento radicular de dentes submetidos a dois tipos diferentes de procedimentos
Beneficiário:Raphaella Silveira Medeiros
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica