Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do SciELO, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Microtensile Bond Strength of Adhesive Systems in Different Dentin Regions on a Class II Cavity Configuration

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti [1] ; Eveline Freitas Soares [2] ; Gabriel Flores Abuna [3] ; Lourenço Correr Sobrinho [4] ; Jean-François Roulet [5] ; Saulo Geraldeli [6]
Número total de Autores: 6
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Universidade de Campinas - Brasil
[2] Universidade de Campinas - Brasil
[3] Universidade de Campinas - Brasil
[4] Universidade de Campinas - Brasil
[5] University of Florida - Estados Unidos
[6] University of Florida - Estados Unidos
Número total de Afiliações: 6
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Brazilian Dental Journal; v. 28, n. 4, p. 474-481, 2017-08-00.
Resumo

Abstract The aim of this study was to evaluate microtensile bond strength (µTBS) of self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesives systems compared in different dentin regions (central-CD or proximal-PD) in a class II cavity configuration. A class II (mesial-oclusal-distal) cavity configuration was simulated on 20 extracted human third-molars (4 mm wide/3 mm deep). Etch-and-rinse adhesive (Scotchbond Multi Purpose, n=5, SBMP and Optibond FL, n=5, OPFL) and self-etch adhesives (Clearfil SE Bond, n=5, CSE and Optibond XTR, n=5, OPXTR) were applied. Class II restorations were performed by incremental technique and photo-activated (Bluephase/G2). Samples were sectioned to beam shape (1 mm² cross-section), placed on Geraldeli’s device for µTBS test (0.5 mm/min cross-head speed). Fracture patterns were analyzed on stereomicroscope and classified as cohesive-resin, adhesive, mixed/resin or mixed/dentin. Samples (n=4) were prepared for scanning electron microscope observation. Data were submitted to one-way ANOVA with Split-Plot arrangement and Tukey’s test (α=0.05). There were no statistically significant differences among SBMP, OPFL, CSE and OPXTR on CD (p>0.05). However, on PD for SBMP and OPFL, µTBS values were significantly lower compared to CSE and OPXTR (p<0.05). In all groups, mixed failure pattern was more frequently observed, except for SBMP/CD (adhesive). In class II type cavity configuration, PD location negatively influenced bond strength of etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Opposite to self-etching adhesives, which presented higher bond strength values compared to etch-and-rinse adhesives in PD. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/11301-4 - Avaliação do potencial remineralizador de um sistema adesivo experimental multi-modo contendo análogos biomiméticos e fosfatos de cálcio bioativos
Beneficiário:Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Exterior - Pesquisa