Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Evaluation of peri-implant marginal tissues around tissue-level and bone-level implants in patients with a history of chronic periodontitis

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Vianna, Tiago T. [1] ; Taiete, Tiago [1] ; Casarin, Renato C. V. [1] ; Giorgi, Maria C. C. [2] ; Aguiar, Flavio Henrique B. [3] ; Silverio, Karina G. [1] ; Nociti Junior, Francisco H. [1] ; Sallum, Enilson A. [1] ; Casati, Marcio Z. [1]
Número total de Autores: 9
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Div Periodont, Piracicaba, SP - Brazil
[2] Amazonas State Univ, Div Restorat Dent, Manaus, Amazonas - Brazil
[3] Univ Estadual Campinas, Piracicaba Dent Sch, Div Restorat Dent, Piracicaba, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY; v. 45, n. 10, p. 1255-1265, OCT 2018.
Citações Web of Science: 2
Resumo

Objective To evaluate clinical and radiographic characteristics in peri-implant marginal tissues in patients with a history of chronic periodontitis, rehabilitated using tissue-level or bone-level implants. Material and MethodsResultsUsing a split-mouth design, 20 patients with a history of chronic periodontitis were selected and received two different implants, tissue-level group (n=20) and the bone-level group (n=20). Peri-implant probing depth, relative peri-implant mucosal margin position, relative peri-implant clinical attachment level, peri-implant plaque index and peri-implant bleeding on probing were evaluated at prosthesis installation, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24months after implant loading. Radiographic marginal bone level was evaluated at implant insertion, prosthesis installation, 6 and 24months after implant loading. The mean difference of peri-implant marginal bone resorption from implant installation to 24months in function was 0.751.12mm for the tissue-level group and 0.70 +/- 0.72mm for the bone-level group. No statistically significant difference was found between groups at all assessment periods for clinical and radiographic peri-implant evaluation. ConclusionUnder a rigid supportive therapy, both approaches performed likewise regarding clinical and radiographic parameters for rehabilitation of patients with a history of chronic periodontitis. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 09/53921-0 - Implantes dentais osseointegrados em pacientes com historico de periodontite agressiva e cronica. avaliacao clinica, microbiologica e imunoenzimatica
Beneficiário:Márcio Zaffalon Casati
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular