Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Laryngeal Mask Airway Versus Other Airway Devices for Anesthesia in Children With an Upper Respiratory Tract Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Respiratory Complications

Texto completo
Autor(es):
de Carvalho, Ana Lygia R. [1] ; Vital, Roberto B. [1] ; de Lira, Carlos C. S. [2] ; Magro, Igor B. [2] ; Sato, Patricia T. S. [1] ; Lima, Lais H. N. [1] ; Braz, Leandro G. [1] ; Modolo, Norma S. P. [1]
Número total de Autores: 8
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Anestesiol, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
[2] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Fac Med Botucatu, Dept Neurol Psicol & Psiquiatria, Botucatu, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 2
Tipo de documento: Artigo de Revisão
Fonte: ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA; v. 127, n. 4, p. 941-950, OCT 2018.
Citações Web of Science: 7
Resumo

There is an association between upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) and an increased incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (PRAEs), which is a major risk for morbidity during pediatric anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to compare the risk of PRAEs among different airway devices during anesthesia in children with a URTI. A systematic review according to the Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was conducted. Only randomized clinical trials evaluating anesthesia in children with a URTI and who were submitted to any of the airway devices were included. From 1030 studies identified, 5 randomized clinical trials were included in the final analysis. There were no statistical differences between laryngeal mask airway (LMA (R)) and endotracheal tube (ETT) regarding breath holding or apnea (risk ratio {[}RR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval {[}CI], 0.41-1.65), laryngospasm (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.18-2.95), and arterial oxygen desaturation (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16-1.17). The quality of evidence was low for the first outcome and very low for the 2 other outcomes, respectively. The LMA use produced a significant reduction of cough (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.58-0.96, low quality of evidence) compared with ETT. The ideal airway management in children with a URTI remains obscure given that there are few data of perioperative respiratory complications during anesthesia. This systematic review demonstrates that LMA use during anesthesia in children with URTI did not result in decrease of the most feared PRAEs. However, LMA was better than ETT in reducing cough. Further research is needed to define the risks more clearly because cough and laryngospasm have similar triggers, and both bronchospasm and laryngospasm trigger cough. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 14/16734-6 - Manejo da via aérea em cirurgia de crianças com história recente de infecção do trato respiratório superior: revisão sistemática e metanálise
Beneficiário:Patricia Tieko Santos Sato
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica