Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Interferential current: a new option for the treatment of sexual complaints in women with premature ovarian insufficiency using systemic hormone therapy: a randomized clinical trial

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Benetti-Pinto, Cristina L. [1] ; Giraldo, Helena P. [1] ; Giraldo, Andrea E. [1] ; Mira, Ticiana A. [1] ; Yela, Daniela A. [1]
Número total de Autores: 5
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Sch Med Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Campinas, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 1
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: MENOPAUSE-THE JOURNAL OF THE NORTH AMERICAN MENOPAUSE SOCIETY; v. 27, n. 5, p. 519-525, MAY 2020.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of interferential current (IC) in the sexual function of women with premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) using systemic hormone therapy (HT), compared to topical estriol. Methods: A randomized clinical trial with 40 women with POI using systemic HT, who were sexually active and referred for dyspareunia and reduction of lubrication. The women were divided into two treatment groups for 4 weeks: IC group (eight electrotherapy sessions twice a week); or E group (estriol vaginal cream, daily application, 0.5 mg/d). The Female Sexual Function Index was used to evaluate pre-/posttreatment sexual function. Results: Mean age was 37.13 +/- 7.27 years and mean treatment time with HT was 8.20 +/- 8.73 years, similar data for both groups. There was an improvement in global sexual function, lubrication, and pain domains for both treatments. The differences between the pre-/posttreatment lubrication scores were respectively 0.75 +/- 3.31 (P = 0.014) for IC and 1.16 +/- 1.22 (P < 0.001) for estriol, whereas for dyspareunia the differences were 1.00 +/- 1.47 (P = 0.005) for IC, and 0.68 +/- 1.30 (P = 0.006) for estriol. There was no pre-/posttreatment difference for the desire and arousal domains. Only in the IC group did orgasm (difference 0.90 +/- 1.42,P = 0.010) and satisfaction improve (difference 0.70 +/- 1.28,P = 0.021). Conclusion: The use of perineal IC seems to be a new option for women with POI using systemic HT and presenting with sexual complaints, leading to an improvement in pain, lubrication, satisfaction, and orgasm. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 15/08334-0 - Influência da Corrente Interferencial sobre a Função Sexual e o Microbioma Vaginal de Mulheres com Falência Ovariana Prematura
Beneficiário:Cristina Laguna Benetti Pinto
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular