| Texto completo | |
| Autor(es): |
Número total de Autores: 2
|
| Afiliação do(s) autor(es): | [1] Univ Estadual Campinas, Ctr Log & Epistemol, Campinas - Brazil
[2] Univ Valencia, Dept Filosofia, Valencia - Spain
Número total de Afiliações: 2
|
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo Científico |
| Fonte: | PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY; DEC 2021. |
| Citações Web of Science: | 0 |
| Resumo | |
According to a recently developed family of relational views, whether two concepts C-1 and C-2 are the same is a matter of an external relation in which their tokens stand. In this paper, we highlight the chief contributions of Relationism in the elucidation of concept sameness, present a set of arguments to the effect that relational accounts of concept sameness fail to accommodate a substantive notion of concept publicity, and offer a diagnosis of this result. We conclude that the strengths of non-relational approaches will also need to be considered in order to fully capture what it means for a concept to be public. (AU) | |
| Processo FAPESP: | 20/11116-3 - Conectando Mentes Distantes |
| Beneficiário: | Matheus Valente Leite |
| Modalidade de apoio: | Bolsas no Brasil - Pós-Doutorado |