Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree


Comparison between connective tissue graft and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix to treat single gingival recession: A data reanalysis of randomized clinical trials

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Viana Miguel, Manuela Maria ; Ferreira Ferraz, Lais Fernanda ; Rossato, Amanda ; Faria Cintra, Tuana Mendonca ; Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes ; Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine
Número total de Autores: 6
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry; v. N/A, p. 10-pg., 2022-06-07.
Resumo

Objectives There are few studies comparing xenogeneic acellular dermal matrixes (XDMs) with connective tissue graft (CTG) to treat single gingival recession (GR). The present study involved a reanalysis of previous studies and comparison of CTG or XDM to treat single RT1/GR. Materials and methods Fifty patients from three previous randomized clinical trials treated either by CTG (n = 25) or XDM (n = 25) were evaluated after 6-month. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic parameters were assessed. Pearson's correlation and regression analyses were also performed. Results Greater recession reduction (RecRed), percentage of root coverage (%RC), and complete root coverage (CRC) were observed in the CTG group (p <= 0.02). Gingival thickness (GT) and keratinized tissue width (KTW) gains were higher in the CTG group. The CTG group showed better esthetic at 6-month. Logistic analyses reported that GT([OR] = 1.647(3)) and papilla height (PH) (OR = 8.20) are predictors of CRC. GT*XDM interaction was a negative predictor of CRC (OR = 7.105(-5)). GT at baseline acted as a predictor of RecRed in both groups (p = 0.03). The XDM graft impacted RecRed and %RC negatively. Baseline PH was a predictor of %RC for both grafts. Conclusion CTG was superior for treating RT1/GR, providing better root coverage outcomes and tissue gains over time. GT, PH, and graft type were classified as predictors of CRC. Clinical significance CTG presented better outcomes to treat single RT1 gingival recession when compared to the XDM. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 21/00588-4 - Comparação entre o uso de enxerto de tecido conjuntivo e matriz dérmica acelular xenógena associados ao retalho posicionado coronariamente para o tratamento de recessões gengivais unitárias: reanálise de dados de dois estudos randomizados
Beneficiário:Tuana Mendonça Faria Cintra
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Iniciação Científica
Processo FAPESP: 12/14595-3 - Influência da aplicação de laser de baixa intensidade no recobrimento radicular associado à técnica de enxerto de tecido conjuntivo: ensaio clínico controlado randomizado
Beneficiário:Mauro Pedrine Santamaria
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular
Processo FAPESP: 14/00119-0 - Comparação de dois tipos de retalho para enxerto de tecido conjuntivo no tratamento de recessões gengivais: estudo clínico randomizado
Beneficiário:Felipe Lucas da Silva Neves
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado
Processo FAPESP: 18/03284-3 - Comparação entre matriz dérmica acelular suína (Mucoderm®) versus tecido conjuntivo no tratamento de recessões gengivais múltiplas associadas à lesão cervical não-cariosa parcialmente restauradas: estudo clínico randomizado
Beneficiário:Amanda Rossato
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado