| Texto completo | |
| Autor(es): |
de Oliveira, Marcela Carneiro
;
de Lima, Mayara Travalini
;
Trindade, Pedro Henrique Esteves
;
Luna, Stelio Pacca Loureiro
Número total de Autores: 4
|
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo Científico |
| Fonte: | VETERINARY ANAESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA; v. 51, n. 5, p. 10-pg., 2024-08-20. |
| Resumo | |
Objective To evaluate if students without training assess pain similarly to an expert, and to compare indications analgesic intervention based on student opinions versus scale scoring. Study design Prospective, blind, randomized, crosssectional study. Animals Video recordings of a bull, horse, cat, pig and sheep. Methods First-year veterinary medicine students assessed one video of a horse (n= 44) and one video of a bull (n =39). Third-year veterinary medicine students assessed one video of a cat (n= 23) and one video of a pig (n= 21). Fourth-year animal science students (n=16) assessed one video of a sheep. The species assessed by different student classes were determined randomly. Students were unaware of animal history or existing pain assessment and decided whether they would provide analgesia according to their opinion. They then scored each video using species-specific validated pain scales. Scores were compared with those of board-certified anesthesiologist (expert). Chi-square test was used to compare students and expert. Results Students underestimated the expert's ' s score 8-20%, except for the horse. There was no difference between the analgesic indication according to the assessment of the expert (143/143, 100%) and students (141/143, 98.6%) considering the defined analgesic intervention threshold for each scale (p=0.478). The indication analgesic intervention according to students' ' opinion (116/ 143, 81.1%) was lower than that according to their scale scores (141/143, 98.6%) (p < 0.0001). Conclusions and clinical relevance Students tended to underestimate pain; however, they detected pain that requires analgesic intervention in animals similarly to an expert. The use of scales optimized the indication for providing analgesia when animals were experiencing pain that required analgesic intervention. (AU) | |
| Processo FAPESP: | 17/12815-0 - Dor e qualidade de vida em animais |
| Beneficiário: | Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna |
| Modalidade de apoio: | Auxílio à Pesquisa - Temático |