Acellular dermal matrix as a barrier in guided bone regeneration: a clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric study in dogs

Autor(es)

Borges, Germana Jayme ^[1] ; Novaes, Jr., Arthur Belem ^[1] ; de Moraes Grisi, Marcio Fernando ^[1] ; Palioto, Daniela Bazan ^[1] ; Taba, Jr., Mario ^[1] ; Scombatti de Souza, Sergio Luis ^[1]

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent Ribeirao Preto, Dept Surg Oral Maxillofacial Traumatol & Periodon, BR-14040904 Sao Paulo - Brazil

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: Clinical Oral Implants Research; v. 20, n. 10, p. 1105-1115, OCT 2009.
• Citações Web of Science: 16

Resumo

Objectives The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the acellular dermal matrix (ADM) as a membrane for guided bone regeneration (GBR), in comparison with a bioabsorbable membrane. Material and methods In seven dogs, the mandibular pre-molars were extracted. After 8 weeks, one bone defect was surgically created bilaterally and the GBR was performed. Each side was randomly assigned to the control group (CG: bioabsorbable membrane made of glycolide and lactide copolymer) or the test group (TG: ADM as a membrane). Immediately following GBR, standardized digital X-ray radiographs were taken, and were repeated at 8 and 16 weeks post-operatively. Before the GBR and euthanasia, clinical measurements of the width and thickness of the keratinized tissue (WKT and TKT, respectively) were performed. One animal was excluded from the study due to complications in the TG during wound healing; therefore, six dogs remained in the sample. The dogs were sacrificed 16 weeks following GBR, and a histomorphometric analysis was performed. Area measurements of new tissue and new bone, and linear measurements of bone height were performed. Results Post-operative healing of the CG was uneventful. In the TG membrane was exposed in two animals, and one of them was excluded from the sample. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any histomorphometric measurement. Clinically, both groups showed an increase in the TKT and a reduction in the WKT. Radiographically, an image suggestive of new bone formation could be observed in both groups at 8 and 16 weeks following GBR. Conclusion ADM acted as a barrier in GBR, with clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric results similar to those obtained with the bioabsorbable membrane. To cite this article:Borges GJ, Novaes AB Jr, de Moraes Grisi MF, Palioto DB, Taba M Jr, de Souza SLS. Acellular dermal matrix as a barrier in guided bone regeneration: a clinical, radiographic and histomorphometric study in dogs.Clin. Oral Impl. Res. 20, 2009; 1105-1115. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 06/55566-5 - Avaliação do uso da matriz dérmica acelular como barreira na regeneração óssea guiada: estudo histomorfométrico em cães
• Beneficiário: Sérgio Luís Scombatti de Souza
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular