| Texto completo | |
| Autor(es): |
Sanchez Castro, Liliana Carolina
Número total de Autores: 1
|
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo Científico |
| Fonte: | SCHOLE-FILOSOFSKOE ANTIKOVEDENIE I KLASSICHESKAYA TRADITSIYA-SCHOLE-ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY AND THE CLASSICAL TRADITION; v. 12, n. 1, p. 48-62, 2018. |
| Citações Web of Science: | 0 |
| Resumo | |
The Neoplatonic commentaries on Aristotle's works have always been considered somehow suspicious. That is partly related to the doctrinal commitments of the commentators, partly with the hermeneutical strategies to which they seem to recur. Both of these reasons have also give place to the accusation of distortion and misunderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy. In the following paper I want to perform an exercise of disclosing the hermeneutical procedure that one of this commentators applies to one of the passages of the first book of the De Anima. The commentator is Philoponus, the passage is the refutation of the soul-harmony theory. My aim is to show that, despite the doctrinal commitments that the commentator may have, his methodology follows Aristotelian guidelines. I hope that this could open perspectives on the value that the commentators must have as philosophers, rather than merely interpreters or paraphrasers. (AU) | |
| Processo FAPESP: | 16/05333-6 - A tradição aristotélica do comentário do 'De Anima' |
| Beneficiário: | Liliana Carolina Sánchez Castro |
| Modalidade de apoio: | Bolsas no Brasil - Pós-Doutorado |