| Full text | |
| Author(s): |
Sanchez Castro, Liliana Carolina
Total Authors: 1
|
| Document type: | Journal article |
| Source: | SCHOLE-FILOSOFSKOE ANTIKOVEDENIE I KLASSICHESKAYA TRADITSIYA-SCHOLE-ANCIENT PHILOSOPHY AND THE CLASSICAL TRADITION; v. 12, n. 1, p. 48-62, 2018. |
| Web of Science Citations: | 0 |
| Abstract | |
The Neoplatonic commentaries on Aristotle's works have always been considered somehow suspicious. That is partly related to the doctrinal commitments of the commentators, partly with the hermeneutical strategies to which they seem to recur. Both of these reasons have also give place to the accusation of distortion and misunderstanding of Aristotle's philosophy. In the following paper I want to perform an exercise of disclosing the hermeneutical procedure that one of this commentators applies to one of the passages of the first book of the De Anima. The commentator is Philoponus, the passage is the refutation of the soul-harmony theory. My aim is to show that, despite the doctrinal commitments that the commentator may have, his methodology follows Aristotelian guidelines. I hope that this could open perspectives on the value that the commentators must have as philosophers, rather than merely interpreters or paraphrasers. (AU) | |
| FAPESP's process: | 16/05333-6 - The Aristotelian tradition on 'De anima' commentary |
| Grantee: | Liliana Carolina Sánchez Castro |
| Support Opportunities: | Scholarships in Brazil - Post-Doctoral |