Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Free gingival graft and acellular dermal matrix for gingival augmentation: a 15-year clinical study

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Cevallos, Cecilia Amparo Reyes [1] ; de Resende, Daniel Romeu Benchimol ; Damante, Carla Andreotti [1] ; Sant'Ana, Adriana Campos Passanezi [1] ; de Rezende, Maria Lucia Rubo [1] ; Greghi, Sebastiao Luiz Aguiar [1] ; Zangrando, Mariana Schutzer Ragghianti [1]
Número total de Autores: 7
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Bauru Sch Dent, Dept Prosthodont & Periodont, Al Octavio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, BR-17012901 Bauru, SP - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 1
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS; v. 24, n. 3, p. 1197-1203, MAR 2020.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Objectives This study evaluated clinical outcomes of acellular dermal matrix (ADM) allograft compared with autogenous free gingival graft (FGG) for gingival augmentation after 15 years. Material and methods Twenty-two patients were originally included and evaluated by de Resende et al. (Clin Oral Investig 23:539-550, 2019), and 12 accepted to participate in this longitudinal evaluation. Clinical parameters evaluated were recession depth (RD), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KTW), and soft tissue thickness (TT). In addition, esthetic perception was evaluated by patients and by a calibrated periodontist. Data were evaluated by ANOVA complemented by Tukey tests (p < 0.05). Results After 15 years, both treatments provided a significant increase in KTW and TT but with superior results for the FGG group (p < 0.05). No differences were observed between groups for PD and CAL. In the ADM group, RD significantly increased in long term, as well as the rate of tissue contraction. The percentage of shrinkage for the ADM group was 59.6%. Conversely, the FGG group presented a creeping attachment of 17.6% and RD significantly decreased in long term. The ADM group presented superior results considering professional esthetic perception. Conclusions Both treatments longitudinally promoted significant gain of keratinized tissue width and thickness with superior outcomes for the FGG group. The ADM group demonstrated more tissue contraction and gingival recession whereas the FGG group presented creeping attachment. Professional esthetic perception was superior for the ADM group. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 99/09834-2 - Avaliação comparativa clínica e histológica de enxertos gengivais livres autógenos e de matriz dérmica acelular alogena na criação e manutenção de uma faixa de mucosa ceratinizada em humanos
Beneficiário:Daniel Romeu Benchimol de Resende
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado