Effectiveness and costs of invasive species control using different techniques to restore cerrado grasslands

Autor(es)

Assis, Geissianny B. ^[1] ; Pilon, Natashi A. L. ^[2] ; Siqueira, Marinez F. ^[3] ; Durigan, Giselda ^{[4, 2]}

Afiliação do(s) autor(es)

^[1] Univ Fed Mato Grosso do Sul, Campus Tres Lagoas, Ave Ranulpho Marques Leal 3484, BR-79620080 Tres Lagoas, MS - Brazil

^[2] Univ Estadual Campinas, UNICAMP, Inst Biol, POB 6109, BR-13083865 Campinas, SP - Brazil

^[3] Inst Pesquisas Jardim Bot Rio de Janeiro, Rua Pacheco Leao 915, BR-22460030 Rio De Janeiro, RJ - Brazil

^[4] Inst Florestal Estado Sao Paulo, Floresta Estadual Assis, POB 104, BR-19802970 Assis, SP - Brazil

• Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
• Fonte: RESTORATION ECOLOGY; v. 29, n. 1, SI APR 2021.
• Citações Web of Science: 3

Resumo

Invasion by exotic grasses is a severe threat to neotropical grasslands conservation and a major challenge for their restoration. To restore fire-prone cerrado grasslands in southeastern Brazil, which have been massively invaded by the African grassUrochloa decumbens, we tested prescribed fire, herbicides, and hoeing, by themselves or in different combinations. Techniques were compared using ecological indicators (decreasing invasive and increasing native vegetation cover and richness) and cost-effectiveness. All treatments, except fire alone, were similarly effective in controlling the invasive grass, which was reduced to less than 5% cover after 2 years. However, only hoeing was effective in recovering both ground cover and richness of the native vegetation, which was the restoration goal. Despite not changing ground cover by native vegetation or alien grasses, fire was successful as a complementary technique, by depleting the seed bank of the invasive grass by 40%. Hoeing preceded by fire and followed by a grass-selective herbicide was the most cost-effective, requiring US\$40 per hectare to increase native ground cover by one percentage point compared to US\$93 per hectare if only hoeing. Despite the low cost and efficacy of glyphosate application for controlling the invasive grass, it must be followed by reintroducing the native ground cover through active restoration. If the restoration target is to recover both structure and richness of the native vegetation without planting, hoeing is the best solution to control alien grasses. (AU)

• Processo FAPESP: 17/20897-6 - Filogenia e atributos funcionais em comunidades herbáceo-arbustivas de Cerrado queimadas e não queimadas
• Beneficiário: Natashi Aparecida Lima Pilon
• Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Exterior - Estágio de Pesquisa - Doutorado
• Processo FAPESP: 13/24760-4 - Invasão do campo cerrado por braquiária (Urochloa decumbens): perdas de diversidade e experimentação de técnicas de restauração
• Beneficiário: Giselda Durigan
• Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular