Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Comparison of two types of xenogeneic matrices to treat single gingival recessions: A randomized clinical trial

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Santamaria, Mauro Pedrine [1, 2] ; Rossato, Amanda [2] ; Viana Miguel, Manuela Maria [2] ; Fonseca, Manuela Bafini [2] ; Gomez Bautista, Cristhian Reynaldo [2] ; Marco, Andrea Carvalho [2] ; Mathias-Santamaria, Ingrid Fernandes [3, 2] ; Ferreira Ferraz, Lais Fernanda [2]
Número total de Autores: 8
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Kentucky, Coll Dent Lexington, Lexington, KY - USA
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Inst Sci & Technol, Div Periodont, Av Engn Francisco Jose Longo 777, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Dent, Div Operat Dent, Dept Gen Dent, Baltimore, MD 21201 - USA
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Journal of Periodontology; NOV 2021.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Background Xenogeneic matrices (XMs) have been increasingly used for root coverage procedures. This study compared the use of two types of XM (collagen matrix {[}CM] and xenogeneic acellular dermal matrix {[}XDM]) associated with the coronally advanced flap technique (CAF) to treat single gingival recessions. Methods Seventy-five patients presenting single RT1 gingival recession were treated by CAF (control group, n = 25), CAF+CM (test group 1, n = 25), or CAF+XDM (test group 2, n = 25) and completed 6-month follow-up. Clinical, patient-centered, and esthetic assessments were performed and intra- and intergroup differences were analyzed. Results At 6 months, the mean recession reduction for CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM was 2.4 +/- 0.8 mm, 2.4 +/- 0.9 mm and 2.1 +/- 0.8 mm, respectively (P > 0.05). The corresponding mean percentage of root coverage was 78.9% +/- 26.2% for CAF, 78.0% +/- 28.5% for CAF+CM, and 65.6% +/- 26.9% for CAF+XDM (P > 0.05). Dentin hypersensitivity and esthetic conditions showed significantly improvements in all groups. Test groups presented significant gains in gingival thickness (GT; CAF+CM: 0.4 +/- 0.3 mm; CAF+XDM: 0.4 +/- 0.2 mm) compared to the control group (CAF: 0.0 +/- 0.1 mm; P < 0.05). Conclusion The CAF, CAF+CM, and CAF+XDM treatments each provided similar results in the treatment of single gingival recessions. The addition of either CM or XDM to CAF increases the GT. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 18/03284-3 - Comparação entre matriz dérmica acelular suína (Mucoderm®) versus tecido conjuntivo no tratamento de recessões gengivais múltiplas associadas à lesão cervical não-cariosa parcialmente restauradas: estudo clínico randomizado
Beneficiário:Amanda Rossato
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Mestrado