Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Peri-implant reconstruction using autologous periosteum-derived cells and guided bone regeneration

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Ribeiro, Fernanda Vieira [1] ; Suaid, Fabricia Ferreira [1] ; Silverio Ruiz, Karina Gonzales [1] ; Rodrigues, Thaisangela Lopes [1] ; Carvalho, Marcelo Diniz [1] ; Nociti, Francisco Humberto [1] ; Sallum, Enilson Antonio [1] ; Casati, Marcio Zaffalon [1]
Número total de Autores: 8
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Campinas UNICAMP, Sch Dent Piracicaba, Dept Prosthodont & Periodont, Sao Paulo - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 1
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY; v. 37, n. 12, p. 1128-1136, DEC 2010.
Citações Web of Science: 7
Resumo

P>Aim This investigation evaluated the bone healing in peri-implant defects treated with periosteum-derived cells (PCs) and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Material and Methods PCs were harvested from six beagle dogs and characterized in vitro with regard to their osteogenic properties. The animals were subjected to teeth extraction in the mandible, and after 3 months of healing, implant sites were drilled, bone dehiscences were created and implants were placed. Dehiscences were randomly assigned to: PCs+GBR, GBR, PCs and non-treated defects. After 3 months, the implants/adjacent tissues were processed. Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) bone fill (BF) within implant threads, and bone area (BA) in a zone lateral to the implant were obtained. Results In vitro analyses confirmed the osteogenic potential of PCs. Histometrically, no statistically significant differences were observed among the PCs+GBR, GBR and PCs groups for both BF and BIC (p > 0.05), whereas these groups showed statistically higher values, as compared with the non-treated group (p < 0.05). With respect to BA, the PCs+GBR and GBR groups presented significantly higher means, as compared with the PCs and non-treated groups (p < 0.05). Conclusion Although successful outcomes have been promoted by using the combined approach, PCs in conjunction with membranes did not provide additional benefit during peri-implant bone regeneration, when compared with the therapeutic approaches used alone. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 07/55596-4 - Novas abordagens para controle de fatores associados aos implantes osseointegrados
Beneficiário:Márcio Zaffalon Casati
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular
Processo FAPESP: 06/59431-7 - Efeito de células mesenquimais derivadas da medula óssea sobre o reparo ósseo ao redor de implantes em defeitos peri-implantes: estudo histomorfométrico em cães
Beneficiário:Fernanda Vieira Ribeiro
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado