Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

The Role of Contingencies and Stimuli in a Human Laboratory Model of Treatment of Problem Behavior

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Dube, William V. [1] ; Thompson, Brooks [1] ; Silveira, Marcelo V. [2] ; Nevin, John A. [3]
Número total de Autores: 4
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Massachusetts, Sch Med, EK Shriver Ctr, Worcester, MA 01655 - USA
[2] Univ Fed Sao Carlos, Dept Psicol, Sao Carlos, SP - Brazil
[3] Univ New Hampshire, Dept Psychol, Durham, NH 03824 - USA
Número total de Afiliações: 3
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: PSYCHOLOGICAL RECORD; v. 67, n. 4, p. 463-471, DEC 2017.
Citações Web of Science: 1
Resumo

Behavioral momentum theory posits a paradoxical implication for behavioral interventions in clinical situations using differential reinforcement of alternative behavior (DRA): When alternative reinforcers are presented within the same context as the problem behavior, the added reinforcers may decrease the frequency of the behavior but also increase its persistence when the intervention ends. Providing alternative reinforcers in a setting that is distinctively different from that in which the target behavior occurs may avoid or reduce this increase in persistence. The present experiment compared behavioral persistence following standard DRA versus DRA in a different context that was available after refraining from target behavior (differential reinforcement of other behavior; DRO). We arranged a human laboratory model of treatment intervention using computer games and token reinforcement. Participants were five individuals with intellectual disabilities. Experimental phases included (a) an initial multiple-schedule baseline with token reinforcement for target behaviors A and B, (b) an intervention phase with alternative reinforcement using a conventional DRA procedure for A and a DRO-DRA procedure for B, and (c) an extinction phase with no interventions and no tokens. Response rates as proportion of baseline in the initial extinction phase were greater for A than for B for three of five participants. Four participants whose response rates remained relatively high during the extinction phase then received a second extinction-plus-distraction test with leisure items available. Response rates were greater for A than for B in three of four participants. The results indicate that DRO-DRA contingencies may contribute to reduced postintervention persistence of problem behavior. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 11/12847-2 - Transferência de função entre estímulos equivalentes mediada por estímulos reforçadores específicos.
Beneficiário:Marcelo Vitor da Silveira
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 15/08332-8 - Transferência de função entre estímulos equivalentes mediada por estímulos reforçadores específicos
Beneficiário:Marcelo Vitor da Silveira
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Exterior - Estágio de Pesquisa - Doutorado