Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Biomechanical analysis of different implant-abutments interfaces in different bone types: An in silico analysis

Texto completo
Autor(es):
Pellizzer, Eduardo P. [1] ; Lemos, Cleidiel A. A. [1] ; Almeida, Daniel A. F. [2] ; de Souza Batista, Victor E. [1, 3] ; Santiago Junior, Joel F. [4] ; Verri, Fellippo R. [1]
Número total de Autores: 6
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Univ Estadual Paulista, UNESP, Aracatuba Dent Sch, Dept Dent Mat & Prosthodont, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[2] Univ Sacred Heart USC, Dept Hlth Sci, Sao Paulo - Brazil
[3] Univ Western Sao Paulo UNOESTE, Presidente Prudente Dent Sch, Dept Prosthodont, Presidente Prudente - Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Alfenas, Dept Restorat Dent, Alfenas, MG - Brazil
Número total de Afiliações: 4
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: Materials Science & Engineering C-Materials for Biological Applications; v. 90, p. 645-650, SEP 1 2018.
Citações Web of Science: 3
Resumo

The purpose of this study was to analyze the stress distribution of bone tissue around implants with different implant-abutment interfaces: platform switching (PSW); external hexagon (EH) and Morse taper (MT) with different diameters (regular: (sic) 4 mm and wide: (sic) 5 mm), bone types (I-IV) and subjected to axial and oblique load conditions using three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D-FEA). Sixteen 3D models of various configurations were simulated using InVesalius, Rhinoceros 3D 4.0, and SolidWorks 2011 software, and processed using Femap 11.2 and NeiNastran 11.0 programs. Axial and oblique forces of 200 N and 100 N, respectively, applied at the occlusal surface of prostheses. Maximum principal stress values were obtained from the peri-implant cortical bone of each model. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey's test for maximum principal stress values. Oblique loading showed higher tensile stress than axial loading (P < 0.001). Wide-diameter implants showed lower stress concentration rather than regular-diameter implants, regardless of both connection and bone type (P < 0.001). Under axial loading, wide-diameter EH implants with regular platforms showed more favorable stress distribution than PSW implants for axial loading (P < 0.001); however, under oblique loading, PSW implants exhibited lower stress concentrations (P < 0.001). Regular-diameter MT implants showed lower stress than EH implants (P < 0.001). Bone type IV showed higher stress in the cortical region than bone types I and II (P < 0.001), but no significant difference when compared with bone type III (P > 0.05). The conclusion drawn from this in silico is that MT implants should be considered for use in situations that preclude the placement of wide-diameter implants, particularly where bone types III and IV are concerned. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 09/16164-7 - Influência da proporço coroa/implante, do tipo de conexo protética e dos diferentes diâmetros do implante na distribuiço das tensões, em restaurações unitárias implantossuportadas: estudo pelo método dos elementos finitos tridimensionais
Beneficiário:Eduardo Piza Pellizzer
Modalidade de apoio: Auxílio à Pesquisa - Regular