Busca avançada
Ano de início
Entree
(Referência obtida automaticamente do Web of Science, por meio da informação sobre o financiamento pela FAPESP e o número do processo correspondente, incluída na publicação pelos autores.)

Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS evaluation for the analysis of antibiotics in agricultural soils

Texto completo
Autor(es):
da Silva, Josiel Jose [1] ; da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [1] ; Stradiotto, Nelson Ramos [1, 2] ; Petrovic, Mira [3, 4, 5] ; Gago-Ferrero, Pablo [4, 5] ; Gros, Meritxell [4, 5]
Número total de Autores: 6
Afiliação do(s) autor(es):
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Inst Chem, BR-14800060 Araraquara, SP - Brazil
[2] Sao Paulo State Univ UNESP, Bioenergy Res Inst IPBEN, BR-14800060 Araraquara, SP - Brazil
[3] Catalan Inst Res & Adv Studies ICREA, Barcelona - Spain
[4] Catalan Inst Water Res ICRA, Emili Grahit 101, Girona 17003 - Spain
[5] Univ Girona, Girona - Spain
Número total de Afiliações: 5
Tipo de documento: Artigo Científico
Fonte: METHODSX; v. 7, 2020.
Citações Web of Science: 0
Resumo

Vinasse, a liquid waste which originates from the production of ethanol fuel from sugarcane, has been widely used as soil amendment in Brazil. An important concern that arises from vinasse reuse is the dissemination of antibiotics to the environment through crop soils. This work evaluated the performance of Pressurized Liquid Extraction (PLE) and QuEChERS (quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe) to extract several multipleclass antibiotics, such as cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, ionophores, lincosamides, macrolides, quinolones, streptogramin, sulfonamides, tetracyclines and others, from agricultural soils. The performance of several parameters was evaluated for both PLE and QuEChERS, such as the extraction temperature (for PLE), solvents composition, pH and the addition of EDTA. Both methods were able to extract most target antibiotics. However, QuEChERS showed higher recoveries for macrolides and nitroimidazoles, while PLE was more suitable for fluoroquinolones and ionophores (i.e. monensin). The use of citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0, in combination with methanol for PLE and with acetonitrile for QuEChERS, provided the highest antibiotic recoveries for both methods. The use of EDTA did not increase antibiotic recovery rates for QuEChERS, while the temperature had almost no influence on the extraction efficiency in PLE. Citrate-phosphate buffer at pH 7.0 provided higher antibiotic recoveries for QuEChERS and PLE. The combination buffer-methanol provided higher recoveries for PLE. QuEChERS and PLE methods were able to extract most of the target antibiotics. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. (AU)

Processo FAPESP: 16/06352-4 - Antibióticos na produção de etanol combustível: análise, dispersão no meio ambiente e efeitos na biodigestão da vinhaça
Beneficiário:Josiel José da Silva
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Brasil - Doutorado
Processo FAPESP: 18/15739-5 - Vinhaça na fertirrigação: avaliação da contaminação do solo e da água subterrânea
Beneficiário:Josiel José da Silva
Modalidade de apoio: Bolsas no Exterior - Estágio de Pesquisa - Doutorado