CV Lattes
ORCID
Google Scholar Citations
Universidade de São Paulo (USP). Faculdade de Direito de Ribeirão Preto (FDRP) (Institutional affiliation from the last research proposal) Birthplace: Brazil
Professor of Civil Procedural Law at the Ribeirão Preto Law School - University of São Paulo (FDRP-USP). PhD (2007) and Master (2003) in Procedural Law - University of São Paulo Law School (FD-USP). Graduated (1997) in Law at Paulista Law School of the Pontifical Catholic University of São Paulo (PUC-SP). Co-chair of the lato sensu postgraduate course in Civil Procedural Law at USP'Ribeirão Preto Law School (FDRP-USP). Academic co-coordinator of the specialization in Collectivization, Precedents, Coherence and Integrity of Law at the National School of Brazilian Judges (ENFAM). Regional coordinator (6th RAJ) of the Escola Paulista da Magistratura (EPM). Member and Regional Director of IBDP (Brazilian Institute of Procedural Law). Member of CEAPRO (Center for Advanced Process Studies), CBAR (Brazilian Arbitration Committee), CEBEPEJ (Brazilian Center for Judicial Studies and Research) and IAPL (International Association of Procedural Law). State Judge in São Paulo since 1998, currently serving as an Assistant Judge in the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice (2021/2024). (Source: Lattes Curriculum)
| News published in Agência FAPESP Newsletter about the researcher |
| More itemsLess items |
| TITULO |
| Articles published in other media outlets ( ): |
| More itemsLess items |
| VEICULO: TITULO (DATA) |
| VEICULO: TITULO (DATA) |
With the growing need to face the main problems of justice in Brazil: the length of the process and the difficulty of materializing the judicial decisions, due - sometimes - to the lack of cooperation of the parties, the Brazilian procedural law experiences an important period of transformation, marked by the continuous search for instruments able to overcome these problems.In this sense,…
The extension of the executive power of the judge, introduced by the general clause included in Article 139, IV of the New Code of Civil Procedure (Law no. 13.105, of March 16, 2015), raised doubts about the limits imposed on this subject in conducting of acts that seek to guarantee the effectiveness of judicial protection. In this context, the present study seeks to find guidelines that …
The collective guardianship is a recently created mechanism to manage the outcome from social issues. The collective lawsuit looks for the effectiveness in accessing formal justice, guardianship rights and interests, which, individually, are not relevant. Brazil is a pioneer country in what concern collective guardianship. The Law of Public Civil Action (1985) and the Customer Defense Cod…
(Only some records are available in English at this moment)
| 6 / 4 | Completed scholarships in Brazil |
| Associated processes | |