Efficacy of conventional treatment with composite resin and atraumatic restorative treatment in posterior primary teeth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Author(s)

Ladewig, Nathalia Miranda ^[1] ; Sahiara, Cintia Saori ^[1] ; Yoshioka, Laysa ^[1] ; Olegario, Isabel Cristina ^[1] ; Floriano, Isabela ^[1] ; Tedesco, Tamara Kerber ^[2] ; Mendes, Fausto Medeiros ^[1] ; Braga, Mariana Minatel ^[1] ; Raggio, Daniela Procida ^[1]

Affiliation

^[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil

^[2] Univ Ibirapuera, Sch Dent, Dept Pediat Dent, Sao Paulo - Brazil

• Document type: Journal article
• Source: BMJ OPEN; v. 7, n. 7 JUL 2017.
• Web of Science Citations: 4

Abstract

Introduction Despite the widespread acceptance of conventional treatment using composite resin in primary teeth, there is limited evidence that this approach is the best option in paediatric clinics. Atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) using high-viscosity glass ionomer cement has gradually become more popular because it performs well in clinical studies, is easy to handle and is patient friendly. Therefore, the aim of this randomised clinical trial study is to compare the restoration longevity of conventional treatment using composite resin with that of ART in posterior primary teeth. As secondary outcomes, cost-efficacy and patient self-reported discomfort will also be tested. Methods and analysis Children aged 3-6 years presenting with at least one occlusal and/or occlusalproximal cavity will be randomly assigned to one of two groups according to the dental treatment: ART (experimental group) or composite resin restoration (control group). The dental treatment will be performed at a dental care trailer located in an educational complex in Barueri/SP, Brazil. The unit of randomisation will be the child. A sample size of 240 teeth with occlusal cavities and 188 teeth with occlusal-proximal cavities has been calculated. The primary outcome will be restoration longevity, which will be clinically assessed after 6, 12, 18 and 24 months by two examiners. The duration of the dental treatment and the cost of all materials used will be considered when estimating the cost-efficacy of each treatment. Individual discomfort will be measured after each dental procedure using the Facial Scale of WongBaker. Ethics and dissemination This clinical trial was approved by the local ethics committee from the Faculty of Dentistry of the University of Sao Paulo (registration no. 1.556.018). Participants will be included after their legal guardians have signed an informed consent form containing detailed information about the research. (AU)

• FAPESP's process: 12/50716-0 - Cost-efectiveness, children's and parental acceptability of using diammine silver fluoride in arresting enamel caries lesions: a series of randomized clinical trials
• Grantee: Mariana Minatel Braga Fraga
• Support Opportunities: Regular Research Grants
• FAPESP's process: 15/11356-6 - Difference of cost-effectiveness between the Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART) and composite resin restorations: a randomized clinical trial
• Grantee: Nathalia de Miranda Ladewig
• Support Opportunities: Scholarships in Brazil - Doctorate (Direct)